FLORA CONSTRUCTION CO. v. GRAND JUNCTION STEEL FAB., 373 U.S. 240 (1963)
U.S. Supreme Court
FLORA CONSTRUCTION CO. v. GRAND JUNCTION STEEL FAB., 373 U.S. 240 (1963) 373 U.S. 240FLORA CONSTRUCTION CO. v. GRAND
JUNCTION STEEL FABRICATING CO. ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF
NEVADA.
No. 949.
Decided May 13, 1963.
Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dispense with printing the jurisdictional statement is granted.
The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
373 U.S. 240 (1963) 373 U.S. 240 (1963) ">
U.S. Supreme Court
SHOTT v. OHIO, 373 U.S. 240 (1963) 373 U.S. 240SHOTT v. OHIO.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO.
No. 877.
Decided May 13, 1963.
Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.
Reported below: 173 Ohio St. 542, 184 N.E.2d 213.
Thurman Arnold, James G. Andrews, Jr. and John A. Lloyd, Jr. for appellant.
Harry C. Schoettmer for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.
MR. JUSTICE BLACK is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.
U.S. Supreme Court
FLORA CONSTRUCTION CO. v. GRAND JUNCTION STEEL FAB., 373 U.S. 240 (1963) 373 U.S. 240 FLORA CONSTRUCTION CO. v. GRAND JUNCTION STEEL FABRICATING CO. ET AL.APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEVADA.
No. 949.
Decided May 13, 1963.
Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. PER CURIAM. The motion to dispense with printing the jurisdictional statement is granted. The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. Page 373 U.S. 240, 241
373 U.S. 240 (1963) 373 U.S. 240 (1963) ">
U.S. Supreme Court
SHOTT v. OHIO, 373 U.S. 240 (1963) 373 U.S. 240 SHOTT v. OHIO.APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO.
No. 877.
Decided May 13, 1963.
Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied. Reported below: 173 Ohio St. 542, 184 N.E.2d 213. Thurman Arnold, James G. Andrews, Jr. and John A. Lloyd, Jr. for appellant. Harry C. Schoettmer for appellee. PER CURIAM. The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied. MR. JUSTICE BLACK is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.