CRAIG v. BENNETT, 372 U.S. 521 (1963)

Syllabus

U.S. Supreme Court

CRAIG v. BENNETT, 372 U.S. 521 (1963) 372 U.S. 521

CRAIG v. BENNETT, WARDEN.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA.
No. 841, Misc.
Decided March 18, 1963.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

Page 372 U.S. 521, 522


372 U.S. 521 (1963) 372 U.S. 521 (1963) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

COLE v. MANNING, 372 U.S. 521 (1963) 372 U.S. 521

COLE ET AL. v. MANNING, PENITENTIARY SUPERINTENDENT.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF SOUTH CAROLINA.
No. 610, Misc.
Decided March 18, 1963.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 240 S. C. 260, 125 S.E.2d 621.

Theodore W. Law, Jr. for appellants.

Daniel R. McLeod, Attorney General of South Carolina, and Victor S. Evans, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

 



Opinions

U.S. Supreme Court

CRAIG v. BENNETT, 372 U.S. 521 (1963) 372 U.S. 521 CRAIG v. BENNETT, WARDEN.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA.
No. 841, Misc.
Decided March 18, 1963.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

Page 372 U.S. 521, 522


372 U.S. 521 (1963) 372 U.S. 521 (1963) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

COLE v. MANNING, 372 U.S. 521 (1963) 372 U.S. 521 COLE ET AL. v. MANNING, PENITENTIARY SUPERINTENDENT.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF SOUTH CAROLINA.
No. 610, Misc.
Decided March 18, 1963.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 240 S. C. 260, 125 S.E.2d 621.

Theodore W. Law, Jr. for appellants.

Daniel R. McLeod, Attorney General of South Carolina, and Victor S. Evans, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.