SHELDON v. FANNIN, 372 U.S. 228 (1963)
Syllabus
U.S. Supreme Court
SHELDON v. FANNIN, 372 U.S. 228 (1963) 372 U.S. 228SHELDON ET AL. v. FANNIN ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF
ARIZONA.
No. 656.
Decided February 18, 1963.
Appeal dismissed.
Reported below: 214 F. Supp. 940.
Hayden C. Covington for appellants.
Robert W. Pickrell, Attorney General of Arizona, and Frank Sagarino, Assistant Attorney General, for appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed.
Opinions
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA.
No. 656.
Decided February 18, 1963.
Appeal dismissed. Reported below: 214 F. Supp. 940. Hayden C. Covington for appellants. Robert W. Pickrell, Attorney General of Arizona, and Frank Sagarino, Assistant Attorney General, for appellees. PER CURIAM. The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed. Page 372 U.S. 228, 229
U.S. Supreme Court
SHELDON v. FANNIN, 372 U.S. 228 (1963) 372 U.S. 228 SHELDON ET AL. v. FANNIN ET AL.APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA.
No. 656.
Decided February 18, 1963.
Appeal dismissed. Reported below: 214 F. Supp. 940. Hayden C. Covington for appellants. Robert W. Pickrell, Attorney General of Arizona, and Frank Sagarino, Assistant Attorney General, for appellees. PER CURIAM. The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed. Page 372 U.S. 228, 229
Search This Case
