KAVANAGH v. BROWN, 371 U.S. 35 (1962)

Decided: October 22, 1962
Syllabus

U.S. Supreme Court

KAVANAGH v. BROWN, 371 U.S. 35 (1962) 371 U.S. 35

KAVANAGH ET AL. v. BROWN, TREASURER OF MICHIGAN, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN
DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN. No. 299.
Decided October 22, 1962.

206 F. Supp. 479, affirmed.

Thomas M. Kavanagh and Eugene F. Black, appellants, pro se.

Frank J. Kelley, Attorney General of Michigan, Eugene Krasicky, Solicitor General, and Stanton S. Faville, Chief Assistant Attorney General, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.


371 U.S. 35 (1962) 371 U.S. 35 (1962) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

CITY OF AKRON v. OHIO, 371 U.S. 35 (1962) 371 U.S. 35

CITY OF AKRON ET AL. v. OHIO EX REL. McELROY, ATTORNEY GENERAL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO.
No. 327.
Decided October 22, 1962.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 173 Ohio St. 189, 181 N.E.2d 26.

James V. Barbuto and Sal Germano for appellants.

Mark McElroy, Attorney General of Ohio, and Theodore R. Saker and Jay C. Flowers, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Page 371 U.S. 35, 36

 



Opinions

U.S. Supreme Court

KAVANAGH v. BROWN, 371 U.S. 35 (1962) 371 U.S. 35 KAVANAGH ET AL. v. BROWN, TREASURER OF MICHIGAN, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN
DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN. No. 299.
Decided October 22, 1962.

206 F. Supp. 479, affirmed.

Thomas M. Kavanagh and Eugene F. Black, appellants, pro se.

Frank J. Kelley, Attorney General of Michigan, Eugene Krasicky, Solicitor General, and Stanton S. Faville, Chief Assistant Attorney General, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.


371 U.S. 35 (1962) 371 U.S. 35 (1962) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

CITY OF AKRON v. OHIO, 371 U.S. 35 (1962) 371 U.S. 35 CITY OF AKRON ET AL. v. OHIO EX REL. McELROY, ATTORNEY GENERAL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO.
No. 327.
Decided October 22, 1962.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 173 Ohio St. 189, 181 N.E.2d 26.

James V. Barbuto and Sal Germano for appellants.

Mark McElroy, Attorney General of Ohio, and Theodore R. Saker and Jay C. Flowers, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Page 371 U.S. 35, 36