LAMB v. CALIFORNIA, 371 U.S. 234 (1963)

Decided: January 7, 1963
Syllabus

U.S. Supreme Court

LAMB v. CALIFORNIA, 371 U.S. 234 (1963) 371 U.S. 234

LAMB v. CALIFORNIA.
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA,
SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT. No. 578.
Decided January 7, 1963.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Reported below: 204 Cal. App. 2d 255, 22 Cal. Rptr. 284.

David Daar for appellant.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.


371 U.S. 234 (1963) 371 U.S. 234 (1963) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

WILLIAMSON v. HOPEWELL REDEVELOPMENT & HOUSING AUTH., 371 U.S. 234 (1963) 371 U.S. 234

WILLIAMSON ET AL. v. HOPEWELL REDEVELOPMENT & HOUSING AUTHORITY.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA.
No. 582.
Decided January 7, 1963.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 203 Va. 653, 125 S.E.2d 849.

Lewis S. Pendleton, Jr. for appellants.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Page 371 U.S. 234, 235

 



Opinions

U.S. Supreme Court

LAMB v. CALIFORNIA, 371 U.S. 234 (1963) 371 U.S. 234 LAMB v. CALIFORNIA.
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA,
SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT. No. 578.
Decided January 7, 1963.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Reported below: 204 Cal. App. 2d 255, 22 Cal. Rptr. 284.

David Daar for appellant.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.


371 U.S. 234 (1963) 371 U.S. 234 (1963) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

WILLIAMSON v. HOPEWELL REDEVELOPMENT & HOUSING AUTH., 371 U.S. 234 (1963) 371 U.S. 234 WILLIAMSON ET AL. v. HOPEWELL REDEVELOPMENT & HOUSING AUTHORITY.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA.
No. 582.
Decided January 7, 1963.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 203 Va. 653, 125 S.E.2d 849.

Lewis S. Pendleton, Jr. for appellants.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Page 371 U.S. 234, 235