WASSERMANN v. BOARD OF REGENTS, UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK, 371 U.S. 23 (1962)

Decided: October 15, 1962
Syllabus

U.S. Supreme Court

WASSERMANN v. BOARD OF REGENTS, UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK, 371 U.S. 23 (1962) 371 U.S. 23

WASSERMANN v. BOARD OF REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF THE
STATE OF NEW YORK.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK. No. 312.
Decided October 15, 1962.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 11 N.Y.2d 173, 182 N.E.2d 264.

Jacob Rassner for appellant.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.


371 U.S. 23 (1962) 371 U.S. 23 (1962) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

MILLER v. LAKE, 371 U.S. 23 (1962) 371 U.S. 23

MILLER v. LAKE, SECRETARY OF STATE OF TEXAS.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS.
No. 415.
Decided October 15, 1962.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

John J. Herrera for appellant.

Will Wilson, Attorney General of Texas, and William E. Allen and H. Grady Chandler, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Page 371 U.S. 23, 24

 



Opinions

U.S. Supreme Court

WASSERMANN v. BOARD OF REGENTS, UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK, 371 U.S. 23 (1962) 371 U.S. 23 WASSERMANN v. BOARD OF REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF THE
STATE OF NEW YORK.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK. No. 312.
Decided October 15, 1962.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 11 N.Y.2d 173, 182 N.E.2d 264.

Jacob Rassner for appellant.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.


371 U.S. 23 (1962) 371 U.S. 23 (1962) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

MILLER v. LAKE, 371 U.S. 23 (1962) 371 U.S. 23 MILLER v. LAKE, SECRETARY OF STATE OF TEXAS.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS.
No. 415.
Decided October 15, 1962.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

John J. Herrera for appellant.

Will Wilson, Attorney General of Texas, and William E. Allen and H. Grady Chandler, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Page 371 U.S. 23, 24