CARR v. NEW YORK, 371 U.S. 14 (1962)
Decided:
October 8, 1962
Syllabus
U.S. Supreme Court
CARR v. NEW YORK, 371 U.S. 14 (1962) 371 U.S. 14CARR v. NEW YORK.
APPEAL FROM THE APPELLATE DIVISION OF THE SUPREME COURT OF
NEW YORK, THIRD JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT. No. 265.
Decided October 8, 1962.
Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Reported below: 15 App. Div. 2d 709, 223 N.Y.S.2d 229.
Irwin N. Wilpon for appellant.
Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney General of New York, and Paxton Blair, Solicitor General, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
MR. JUSTICE GOLDBERG took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
Opinions
APPEAL FROM THE APPELLATE DIVISION OF THE SUPREME COURT OF
NEW YORK, THIRD JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT. No. 265.
Decided October 8, 1962.
Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. Reported below: 15 App. Div. 2d 709, 223 N.Y.S.2d 229. Irwin N. Wilpon for appellant. Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney General of New York, and Paxton Blair, Solicitor General, for appellee. PER CURIAM. The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. MR. JUSTICE GOLDBERG took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. Page 371 U.S. 14, 15
U.S. Supreme Court
CARR v. NEW YORK, 371 U.S. 14 (1962) 371 U.S. 14 CARR v. NEW YORK.APPEAL FROM THE APPELLATE DIVISION OF THE SUPREME COURT OF
NEW YORK, THIRD JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT. No. 265.
Decided October 8, 1962.
Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. Reported below: 15 App. Div. 2d 709, 223 N.Y.S.2d 229. Irwin N. Wilpon for appellant. Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney General of New York, and Paxton Blair, Solicitor General, for appellee. PER CURIAM. The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. MR. JUSTICE GOLDBERG took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. Page 371 U.S. 14, 15
Search This Case
