HOHENSEE v. NEWS SYNDICATE, INC., 369 U.S. 659 (1962)
U.S. Supreme Court
HOHENSEE v. NEWS SYNDICATE, INC., 369 U.S. 659 (1962) 369 U.S. 659HOHENSEE v. NEWS SYNDICATE, INC.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF
APPEALS
FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT. No. 214.
Decided May 14, 1962.
Certiorari granted; judgment vacated; case remanded for consideration in light of Goldlawr, Inc., v. Heiman, ante, p. 463.
Reported below: 286 F.2d 527.
James C. Newton for petitioner.
Stuart N. Updike for respondent.
PER CURIAM.
The petition for writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded for consideration in light of Goldlawr, Inc., v. Heiman, ante, p. 463.
MR. JUSTICE HARLAN and MR. JUSTICE STEWART, for the reasons given in their dissent in the Goldlawr case, would deny certiorari.
MR. JUSTICE FRANKFURTER took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
U.S. Supreme Court
HOHENSEE v. NEWS SYNDICATE, INC., 369 U.S. 659 (1962) 369 U.S. 659 HOHENSEE v. NEWS SYNDICATE, INC.ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT. No. 214.
Decided May 14, 1962.
Certiorari granted; judgment vacated; case remanded for consideration in light of Goldlawr, Inc., v. Heiman, ante, p. 463. Reported below: 286 F.2d 527. James C. Newton for petitioner. Stuart N. Updike for respondent. PER CURIAM. The petition for writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded for consideration in light of Goldlawr, Inc., v. Heiman, ante, p. 463. MR. JUSTICE HARLAN and MR. JUSTICE STEWART, for the reasons given in their dissent in the Goldlawr case, would deny certiorari. MR. JUSTICE FRANKFURTER took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. Page 369 U.S. 659, 660
