SUNKIST GROWERS, INC. v. WINCKLER & SMITH CITRUS PRODUCTS CO., 368 U.S. 813 (1961)
Syllabus
U.S. Supreme Court
SUNKIST GROWERS, INC. v. WINCKLER & SMITH CITRUS PRODUCTS CO. , 368 U.S. 813 (1961)368 U.S. 813
SUNKIST GROWERS, INC., et al.,
petitioners,
v.
WINCKLER & SMITH CITRUS PRODUCTS CO. et al.
No. 241.
Supreme Court of the United States
October 9, 1961
Ross C. Fisher and Herman F. Selvin, for petitioners.
William C. Dixon, for respondents.
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit granted limited to Question 1 presented by the petition which reads as follows:
'1. Where a group of citrus fruit
growers form a cooperative organization for the purpose of
collectively processing and marketing their fruit, and carry out
those functions through the agency of three co-operative
agricultural associations, each of which is basically wholly owned
and governed by those growers, and each of which is admittedly
entitled to the exemption from the antitrust laws accorded to
agricultural cooperatives by the Capper-Volstead Act (7 U. S.C.A.,
sec. 291)-is an unlawful conspiracy, combination or agreement
established under Sections 1 and 2 of the Sherman Act [15 U.S.C.A.
1, 2] upon proof only that these growers, through the agency of
these three cooperatives, agreed among only themselves with respect
to the extent of the division of the function of processing between
them or with respect to the price they would charge in the open
market for the fruit and the by-products thereof processed and
marketed by them?'
The case is transferred to the summary calendar.[ Sunkist
Growers, Inc. v. Winckler & Smith Citrus Products Co. 368 U.S. 813 (1961) ]
Opinions
v.
WINCKLER & SMITH CITRUS PRODUCTS CO. et al.
No. 241. Supreme Court of the United States October 9, 1961 Ross C. Fisher and Herman F. Selvin, for petitioners. William C. Dixon, for respondents. Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit granted limited to Question 1 presented by the petition which reads as follows:
U.S. Supreme Court
SUNKIST GROWERS, INC. v. WINCKLER & SMITH CITRUS PRODUCTS CO. , 368 U.S. 813 (1961) 368 U.S. 813 SUNKIST GROWERS, INC., et al., petitioners,v.
WINCKLER & SMITH CITRUS PRODUCTS CO. et al.
No. 241. Supreme Court of the United States October 9, 1961 Ross C. Fisher and Herman F. Selvin, for petitioners. William C. Dixon, for respondents. Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit granted limited to Question 1 presented by the petition which reads as follows:
'1. Where a group of citrus fruit
growers form a cooperative organization for the purpose of
collectively processing and marketing their fruit, and carry out
those functions through the agency of three co-operative
agricultural associations, each of which is basically wholly owned
and governed by those growers, and each of which is admittedly
entitled to the exemption from the antitrust laws accorded to
agricultural cooperatives by the Capper-Volstead Act (7 U. S.C.A.,
sec. 291)-is an unlawful conspiracy, combination or agreement
established under Sections 1 and 2 of the Sherman Act [15 U.S.C.A.
1, 2] upon proof only that these growers, through the agency of
these three cooperatives, agreed among only themselves with respect
to the extent of the division of the function of processing between
them or with respect to the price they would charge in the open
market for the fruit and the by-products thereof processed and
marketed by them?'
The case is transferred to the summary calendar.[ Sunkist
Growers, Inc. v. Winckler & Smith Citrus Products Co. 368
U.S. 813 (1961) ]
Search This Case
