OWENS v. ELLIS, 368 U.S. 33 (1961)

Syllabus

U.S. Supreme Court

OWENS v. ELLIS, 368 U.S. 33 (1961) 368 U.S. 33

OWENS v. ELLIS, CORRECTIONS DIRECTOR, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS.
No. 506, Misc.
Decided November 6, 1961.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Page 368 U.S. 33, 34


368 U.S. 33 (1961) 368 U.S. 33 (1961) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

TWENTIETH CENTURY-FOX FILM CORP. v. GEROSA, 368 U.S. 33 (1961) 368 U.S. 33

TWENTIETH CENTURY-FOX FILM CORP. v. GEROSA, COMPTROLLER OF NEW YORK CITY.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK.
No. 373.
Decided November 6, 1961.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

William W. Owens for appellant.

Leo A. Larkin, Stanley Buchsbaum and Morris L. Heath for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.

 



Opinions

U.S. Supreme Court

OWENS v. ELLIS, 368 U.S. 33 (1961) 368 U.S. 33 OWENS v. ELLIS, CORRECTIONS DIRECTOR, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS.
No. 506, Misc.
Decided November 6, 1961.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Page 368 U.S. 33, 34


368 U.S. 33 (1961) 368 U.S. 33 (1961) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

TWENTIETH CENTURY-FOX FILM CORP. v. GEROSA, 368 U.S. 33 (1961) 368 U.S. 33 TWENTIETH CENTURY-FOX FILM CORP. v. GEROSA, COMPTROLLER OF NEW YORK CITY.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK.
No. 373.
Decided November 6, 1961.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

William W. Owens for appellant.

Leo A. Larkin, Stanley Buchsbaum and Morris L. Heath for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.