HERRIN TRANSPORTATION CO. v. UNITED STATES, 366 U.S. 419 (1961)
Syllabus
U.S. Supreme Court
HERRIN TRANSPORTATION CO. v. UNITED STATES, 366 U.S. 419 (1961) 366 U.S. 419HERRIN TRANSPORTATION CO. v. UNITED
STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN
DISTRICT OF
TEXAS. No. 837.
Decided May 22, 1961.
186 F. Supp. 777, affirmed.
Carl L. Phinney for appellant.
Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Loevinger, Richard A. Solomon, Robert W. Ginnane and James Y. Piper for the United States, and Ewell H. Muse, Jr. for Strickland Transportation Co., appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.
Opinions
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF
TEXAS. No. 837.
Decided May 22, 1961.
186 F. Supp. 777, affirmed. Carl L. Phinney for appellant. Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Loevinger, Richard A. Solomon, Robert W. Ginnane and James Y. Piper for the United States, and Ewell H. Muse, Jr. for Strickland Transportation Co., appellees. PER CURIAM. The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed. Page 366 U.S. 419, 420
U.S. Supreme Court
HERRIN TRANSPORTATION CO. v. UNITED STATES, 366 U.S. 419 (1961) 366 U.S. 419 HERRIN TRANSPORTATION CO. v. UNITED STATES ET AL.APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF
TEXAS. No. 837.
Decided May 22, 1961.
186 F. Supp. 777, affirmed. Carl L. Phinney for appellant. Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Loevinger, Richard A. Solomon, Robert W. Ginnane and James Y. Piper for the United States, and Ewell H. Muse, Jr. for Strickland Transportation Co., appellees. PER CURIAM. The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed. Page 366 U.S. 419, 420
Search This Case
