ATCHLEY v. CALIFORNIA, 366 U.S. 207 (1961)
Argued:
April 25, 1961
Decided:
May 1, 1961
Syllabus
U.S. Supreme Court
ATCHLEY v. CALIFORNIA, 366 U.S. 207 (1961) 366 U.S. 207ATCHLEY v. CALIFORNIA.
CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA.
No. 95.
Argued April 25, 1961.
Decided May 1, 1961.
Certiorari dismissed as not warranted on record.
Reported below: 53 Cal. 2d 160, 346 P.2d 764.
Rosalie S. Asher argued the cause and filed briefs for petitioner.
Doris H. Maier, Deputy Attorney General of California, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the briefs was Stanley Mosk, Attorney General of California.
PER CURIAM.
After hearing oral argument and fully examining the record, we conclude that the totality of circumstances as the record makes them manifest did not warrant bringing the case here. Accordingly, the writ is dismissed.
Opinions
CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA.
No. 95.
Argued April 25, 1961.
Decided May 1, 1961.
Certiorari dismissed as not warranted on record. Reported below: 53 Cal. 2d 160, 346 P.2d 764. Rosalie S. Asher argued the cause and filed briefs for petitioner. Doris H. Maier, Deputy Attorney General of California, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the briefs was Stanley Mosk, Attorney General of California. PER CURIAM. After hearing oral argument and fully examining the record, we conclude that the totality of circumstances as the record makes them manifest did not warrant bringing the case here. Accordingly, the writ is dismissed. Page 366 U.S. 207, 208
U.S. Supreme Court
ATCHLEY v. CALIFORNIA, 366 U.S. 207 (1961) 366 U.S. 207 ATCHLEY v. CALIFORNIA.CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA.
No. 95.
Argued April 25, 1961.
Decided May 1, 1961.
Certiorari dismissed as not warranted on record. Reported below: 53 Cal. 2d 160, 346 P.2d 764. Rosalie S. Asher argued the cause and filed briefs for petitioner. Doris H. Maier, Deputy Attorney General of California, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the briefs was Stanley Mosk, Attorney General of California. PER CURIAM. After hearing oral argument and fully examining the record, we conclude that the totality of circumstances as the record makes them manifest did not warrant bringing the case here. Accordingly, the writ is dismissed. Page 366 U.S. 207, 208
Materials
Search This Case
