TRI-CITY BROADCASTING CO. v. BOWERS, 361 U.S. 97 (1959)
Syllabus
U.S. Supreme Court
TRI-CITY BROADCASTING CO. v. BOWERS, 361 U.S. 97 (1959) 361 U.S. 97TRI-CITY BROADCASTING CO. v. BOWERS,
TAX COMMISSIONER OF OHIO.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO.
No. 406.
Decided November 16, 1959.
Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Reported below: 169 Ohio St. 126, 158 N.E.2d 203.
Carlton S. Dargusch, Carlton S. Dargusch, Jr. and Jack H. Bertsch for appellant.
Mark McElroy, Attorney General of Ohio, and Joseph D. Karam, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Opinions
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO.
No. 406.
Decided November 16, 1959.
Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. Reported below: 169 Ohio St. 126, 158 N.E.2d 203. Carlton S. Dargusch, Carlton S. Dargusch, Jr. and Jack H. Bertsch for appellant. Mark McElroy, Attorney General of Ohio, and Joseph D. Karam, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee. PER CURIAM. The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. Page 361 U.S. 97, 98
U.S. Supreme Court
TRI-CITY BROADCASTING CO. v. BOWERS, 361 U.S. 97 (1959) 361 U.S. 97 TRI-CITY BROADCASTING CO. v. BOWERS, TAX COMMISSIONER OF OHIO.APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO.
No. 406.
Decided November 16, 1959.
Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. Reported below: 169 Ohio St. 126, 158 N.E.2d 203. Carlton S. Dargusch, Carlton S. Dargusch, Jr. and Jack H. Bertsch for appellant. Mark McElroy, Attorney General of Ohio, and Joseph D. Karam, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee. PER CURIAM. The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. Page 361 U.S. 97, 98
Search This Case
