ST. JOHNS MOTOR EXPRESS CO. v. UNITED STATES, 361 U.S. 84 (1959)
Syllabus
U.S. Supreme Court
ST. JOHNS MOTOR EXPRESS CO. v. UNITED STATES, 361 U.S. 84 (1959) 361 U.S. 84ST. JOHNS MOTOR EXPRESS CO. ET AL. v.
UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF
OREGON.
No. 337.
Decided November 9, 1959.
Judgment affirmed.
Bryce Rea, Jr. for appellants.
Solicitor General Rankin, Acting Assistant Attorney General Bicks, Richard A. Solomon, John C. Danielson and Robert W. Ginnane for the United States and the Interstate Commerce Commission, Earle V. White for Everts' Commercial Transport, Inc., and Albert E. Stephan for Inland Petroleum Transportation Co., Inc., appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.
Opinions
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON.
No. 337.
Decided November 9, 1959.
Judgment affirmed. Bryce Rea, Jr. for appellants. Solicitor General Rankin, Acting Assistant Attorney General Bicks, Richard A. Solomon, John C. Danielson and Robert W. Ginnane for the United States and the Interstate Commerce Commission, Earle V. White for Everts' Commercial Transport, Inc., and Albert E. Stephan for Inland Petroleum Transportation Co., Inc., appellees. PER CURIAM. The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed. Page 361 U.S. 84, 85
U.S. Supreme Court
ST. JOHNS MOTOR EXPRESS CO. v. UNITED STATES, 361 U.S. 84 (1959) 361 U.S. 84 ST. JOHNS MOTOR EXPRESS CO. ET AL. v. UNITED STATES ET AL.APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON.
No. 337.
Decided November 9, 1959.
Judgment affirmed. Bryce Rea, Jr. for appellants. Solicitor General Rankin, Acting Assistant Attorney General Bicks, Richard A. Solomon, John C. Danielson and Robert W. Ginnane for the United States and the Interstate Commerce Commission, Earle V. White for Everts' Commercial Transport, Inc., and Albert E. Stephan for Inland Petroleum Transportation Co., Inc., appellees. PER CURIAM. The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed. Page 361 U.S. 84, 85
Search This Case
