WOMACK v. OHIO, 361 U.S. 5 (1959)
Syllabus
U.S. Supreme Court
WOMACK v. OHIO, 361 U.S. 5 (1959) 361 U.S. 5WOMACK v. OHIO.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF
OHIO.
No. 12, Misc.
Decided October 12, 1959.
Certiorari granted and judgment reversed.
Petitioner pro se.
Mark McElroy, Attorney General of Ohio, and William M. Vance, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
PER CURIAM.
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted and the judgment is reversed. Burns v. Ohio, 360 U.S. 252.
MR. JUSTICE STEWART took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
Opinions
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO.
No. 12, Misc.
Decided October 12, 1959.
Certiorari granted and judgment reversed. Petitioner pro se. Mark McElroy, Attorney General of Ohio, and William M. Vance, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent. PER CURIAM. The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted and the judgment is reversed. Burns v. Ohio, 360 U.S. 252. MR. JUSTICE STEWART took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. Page 361 U.S. 5, 6
U.S. Supreme Court
WOMACK v. OHIO, 361 U.S. 5 (1959) 361 U.S. 5 WOMACK v. OHIO.ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO.
No. 12, Misc.
Decided October 12, 1959.
Certiorari granted and judgment reversed. Petitioner pro se. Mark McElroy, Attorney General of Ohio, and William M. Vance, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent. PER CURIAM. The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted and the judgment is reversed. Burns v. Ohio, 360 U.S. 252. MR. JUSTICE STEWART took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. Page 361 U.S. 5, 6
Search This Case
