MEMORIAL GARDENS ASSN. v. SMITH, 361 U.S. 31 (1959)
Syllabus
U.S. Supreme Court
MEMORIAL GARDENS ASSN. v. SMITH, 361 U.S. 31 (1959) 361 U.S. 31MEMORIAL GARDENS ASSOCIATION, INC., ET
AL. v. SMITH, AUDITOR OF
PUBLIC ACCOUNTS OF ILLINOIS, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF ILLINOIS. No. 288.
Decided October 19, 1959.
Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Reported below: 16 Ill. 2d 116, 156 N.E.2d 587.
C. Severin Buschmann and Roy P. Hull for appellants.
Grenville Beardsley, Attorney General of Illinois, and William C. Wines, Raymond S. Sarnow and A. Zola Groves, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Opinions
PUBLIC ACCOUNTS OF ILLINOIS, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF ILLINOIS. No. 288.
Decided October 19, 1959.
Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. Reported below: 16 Ill. 2d 116, 156 N.E.2d 587. C. Severin Buschmann and Roy P. Hull for appellants. Grenville Beardsley, Attorney General of Illinois, and William C. Wines, Raymond S. Sarnow and A. Zola Groves, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellees. PER CURIAM. The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. Page 361 U.S. 31, 32
U.S. Supreme Court
MEMORIAL GARDENS ASSN. v. SMITH, 361 U.S. 31 (1959) 361 U.S. 31 MEMORIAL GARDENS ASSOCIATION, INC., ET AL. v. SMITH, AUDITOR OFPUBLIC ACCOUNTS OF ILLINOIS, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF ILLINOIS. No. 288.
Decided October 19, 1959.
Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. Reported below: 16 Ill. 2d 116, 156 N.E.2d 587. C. Severin Buschmann and Roy P. Hull for appellants. Grenville Beardsley, Attorney General of Illinois, and William C. Wines, Raymond S. Sarnow and A. Zola Groves, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellees. PER CURIAM. The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. Page 361 U.S. 31, 32
Search This Case
