FORD MOTOR CO. v. PARK, 360 U.S. 251 (1959)
Syllabus
U.S. Supreme Court
FORD MOTOR CO. v. PARK, 360 U.S. 251 (1959) 360 U.S. 251FORD MOTOR CO. v. PARK ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF MICHIGAN.
No. 831.
Decided June 8, 1959.
Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Reported below: 355 Mich. 103, 94 N.W.2d 407.
William T. Gossett and L. Homer Surbeck for appellant.
Abraham L. Zwerdling and Harold A. Cranefield for Park et al., appellees.
Paul L. Adams, Attorney General of Michigan, Stanton S. Faville, Chief Assistant Attorney General, and Samuel J. Torina, Solicitor General, for the Attorney General of Michigan, appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Opinions
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF MICHIGAN.
No. 831.
Decided June 8, 1959.
Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. Reported below: 355 Mich. 103, 94 N.W.2d 407. William T. Gossett and L. Homer Surbeck for appellant. Abraham L. Zwerdling and Harold A. Cranefield for Park et al., appellees. Paul L. Adams, Attorney General of Michigan, Stanton S. Faville, Chief Assistant Attorney General, and Samuel J. Torina, Solicitor General, for the Attorney General of Michigan, appellee. PER CURIAM. The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. Page 360 U.S. 251, 252
U.S. Supreme Court
FORD MOTOR CO. v. PARK, 360 U.S. 251 (1959) 360 U.S. 251 FORD MOTOR CO. v. PARK ET AL.APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF MICHIGAN.
No. 831.
Decided June 8, 1959.
Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. Reported below: 355 Mich. 103, 94 N.W.2d 407. William T. Gossett and L. Homer Surbeck for appellant. Abraham L. Zwerdling and Harold A. Cranefield for Park et al., appellees. Paul L. Adams, Attorney General of Michigan, Stanton S. Faville, Chief Assistant Attorney General, and Samuel J. Torina, Solicitor General, for the Attorney General of Michigan, appellee. PER CURIAM. The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. Page 360 U.S. 251, 252
Search This Case
