COMMERCIAL BARGE LINES, v. UNITED STATES, 359 U.S. 342 (1959)
U.S. Supreme Court
COMMERCIAL BARGE LINES, v. UNITED STATES, 359 U.S. 342 (1959) 359 U.S. 342COMMERCIAL BARGE LINES, INC., ET AL. v.
UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN
DISTRICT
OF MICHIGAN. No. 721.
Decided April 27, 1959.
166 F. Supp. 867, affirmed.
Dudley B. Tenney and Nuel D. Belnap for appellants.
Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Hansen, Robert W. Ginnane and Charlie H. Johns for the United States and the Interstate Commerce Commission, appellees.
Stuart B. Bradley, Carl Helmetag, Jr., J. D. Feeney, Harry C. Ames, R. Granville Curry, Frederick M. Dolan, Donald Macleay and Russell S. Bernhard for Carrier Appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.
U.S. Supreme Court
COMMERCIAL BARGE LINES, v. UNITED STATES, 359 U.S. 342 (1959) 359 U.S. 342 COMMERCIAL BARGE LINES, INC., ET AL. v. UNITED STATES ET AL.APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT
OF MICHIGAN. No. 721.
Decided April 27, 1959.
166 F. Supp. 867, affirmed. Dudley B. Tenney and Nuel D. Belnap for appellants. Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Hansen, Robert W. Ginnane and Charlie H. Johns for the United States and the Interstate Commerce Commission, appellees. Stuart B. Bradley, Carl Helmetag, Jr., J. D. Feeney, Harry C. Ames, R. Granville Curry, Frederick M. Dolan, Donald Macleay and Russell S. Bernhard for Carrier Appellees. PER CURIAM. The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed. Page 359 U.S. 342, 343