FRIEDMAN v. UNITED STATES, 359 U.S. 205 (1959)
Syllabus
U.S. Supreme Court
FRIEDMAN v. UNITED STATES, 359 U.S. 205 (1959) 359 U.S. 205FRIEDMAN v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN
DISTRICT
OF NEW YORK. No. 675.
Decided March 30, 1959.
168 F. Supp. 815, affirmed.
Irving D. Friedman and Sol Friedman for appellant.
Solicitor General Rankin and Robert W. Ginnane for the United States and the Interstate Commerce Commission, appellees. Joseph H. Wright and Erle J. Zoll, Jr. for railroad appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.
Opinions
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT
OF NEW YORK. No. 675.
Decided March 30, 1959.
168 F. Supp. 815, affirmed. Irving D. Friedman and Sol Friedman for appellant. Solicitor General Rankin and Robert W. Ginnane for the United States and the Interstate Commerce Commission, appellees. Joseph H. Wright and Erle J. Zoll, Jr. for railroad appellees. PER CURIAM. The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed. Page 359 U.S. 205, 206
U.S. Supreme Court
FRIEDMAN v. UNITED STATES, 359 U.S. 205 (1959) 359 U.S. 205 FRIEDMAN v. UNITED STATES ET AL.APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT
OF NEW YORK. No. 675.
Decided March 30, 1959.
168 F. Supp. 815, affirmed. Irving D. Friedman and Sol Friedman for appellant. Solicitor General Rankin and Robert W. Ginnane for the United States and the Interstate Commerce Commission, appellees. Joseph H. Wright and Erle J. Zoll, Jr. for railroad appellees. PER CURIAM. The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed. Page 359 U.S. 205, 206
Search This Case
