WOODY v. UNITED STATES, 359 U.S. 118 (1959)
Argued:
January 14, 1959
Decided:
March 23, 1959
Syllabus
U.S. Supreme Court
WOODY v. UNITED STATES, 359 U.S. 118 (1959) 359 U.S. 118WOODY v. UNITED STATES.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH
CIRCUIT.
No. 135.
Argued January 14, 1959.
Decided March 23, 1959.
Judgment affirmed by an equally divided Court.
Reported below: 258 F.2d 535.
Clarence O. Woolsey, acting under appointment by the Court, 358 U.S. 802, argued the cause and filed a brief for petitioner.
Beatrice Rosenberg argued the cause for the United States. With her on the brief were Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Anderson and Robert G. Maysack.
PER CURIAM.
The judgment is affirmed by an equally divided Court.
MR. JUSTICE STEWART took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
Opinions
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT.
No. 135.
Argued January 14, 1959.
Decided March 23, 1959.
Judgment affirmed by an equally divided Court. Reported below: 258 F.2d 535. Clarence O. Woolsey, acting under appointment by the Court, 358 U.S. 802, argued the cause and filed a brief for petitioner. Beatrice Rosenberg argued the cause for the United States. With her on the brief were Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Anderson and Robert G. Maysack. PER CURIAM. The judgment is affirmed by an equally divided Court. MR. JUSTICE STEWART took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. Page 359 U.S. 118, 119
U.S. Supreme Court
WOODY v. UNITED STATES, 359 U.S. 118 (1959) 359 U.S. 118 WOODY v. UNITED STATES.CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT.
No. 135.
Argued January 14, 1959.
Decided March 23, 1959.
Judgment affirmed by an equally divided Court. Reported below: 258 F.2d 535. Clarence O. Woolsey, acting under appointment by the Court, 358 U.S. 802, argued the cause and filed a brief for petitioner. Beatrice Rosenberg argued the cause for the United States. With her on the brief were Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Anderson and Robert G. Maysack. PER CURIAM. The judgment is affirmed by an equally divided Court. MR. JUSTICE STEWART took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. Page 359 U.S. 118, 119
Materials
Search This Case
