Spevack v. Strauss, 359 U.S. 115 (1959)
Argued:
March 5, 1959
Decided:
March 23, 1959
Syllabus
U.S. Supreme Court
Spevack v. Strauss, 359 U.S. 115 (1959)Spevack v. Strauss
No. 339
Argued March 5, 1959
Decided March 23, 1959
359 U.S. 115
Syllabus
It appearing upon oral argument that, in the normal course, the fee for petitioner's United States patent must be paid by May 25, 1959, and that the patent will issue shortly after payment of the fee, the case is remanded to the District Court with instructions.
Reported below: 103 U.S.App.D.C. 204, 257 F.2d 208.
Opinions
U.S. Supreme Court
Spevack v. Strauss, 359 U.S. 115 (1959) Spevack v. Strauss No. 339 Argued March 5, 1959 Decided March 23, 1959 359 U.S. 115 CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Syllabus It appearing upon oral argument that, in the normal course, the fee for petitioner's United States patent must be paid by May 25, 1959, and that the patent will issue shortly after payment of the fee, the case is remanded to the District Court with instructions. Reported below: 103 U.S.App.D.C. 204, 257 F.2d 208. PER CURIAM. Upon oral argument, it appeared that, in the normal course, the fee for petitioner's United States patent must be paid by May 25, 1959, and that the patent will issue shortly after payment of the fee. Accordingly, the case is remanded to the District Court and that court is instructed: (1) If petitioner has, by May 25, 1959, paid the patent fee for his patent, and has not requested a suspension or delay in the issuance thereof, or has withdrawn any such request theretofore made, to continue the Page 359 U. S. 116 case and the restraining orders entered herein by THE CHIEF JUSTICE until the patent issues, and then to dismiss the complaint as moot; (2) otherwise, on May 25, 1959, to dismiss the complaint on the ground that, apart from the merits of the controversy, the grant of the extraordinary equitable relief of an injunction at that stage of the proceedings would not be warranted. Upon the fulfillment of either of these conditions, the proceedings heretofore had in the two lower courts are vacated.
Materials
Search This Case