NAT. BISCUIT CO. v. PENNSYLVANIA, 357 U.S. 571 (1958)
Decided:
June 30, 1958
Syllabus
U.S. Supreme Court
NAT. BISCUIT CO. v. PENNSYLVANIA, 357 U.S. 571 (1958) 357 U.S. 571NATIONAL BISCUIT CO. v.
PENNSYLVANIA.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA, MIDDLE DISTRICT.
No. 990.
Decided June 30, 1958.
Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Reported below: 390 Pa. 642, 136 A.2d 821.
Roy J. Keefer and Leslie M. Swope for appellant.
Thomas D. McBride, Attorney General of Pennsylvania, and George W. Keitel, Deputy Attorney General, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Opinions
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA, MIDDLE DISTRICT.
No. 990.
Decided June 30, 1958.
Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. Reported below: 390 Pa. 642, 136 A.2d 821. Roy J. Keefer and Leslie M. Swope for appellant. Thomas D. McBride, Attorney General of Pennsylvania, and George W. Keitel, Deputy Attorney General, for appellee. PER CURIAM. The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. Page 357 U.S. 571, 572
U.S. Supreme Court
NAT. BISCUIT CO. v. PENNSYLVANIA, 357 U.S. 571 (1958) 357 U.S. 571 NATIONAL BISCUIT CO. v. PENNSYLVANIA.APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA, MIDDLE DISTRICT.
No. 990.
Decided June 30, 1958.
Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. Reported below: 390 Pa. 642, 136 A.2d 821. Roy J. Keefer and Leslie M. Swope for appellant. Thomas D. McBride, Attorney General of Pennsylvania, and George W. Keitel, Deputy Attorney General, for appellee. PER CURIAM. The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. Page 357 U.S. 571, 572
Search This Case
