SOUTHERN RAILWAY CO. v. UNITED STATES, 355 U.S. 370 (1958)
Decided:
January 13, 1958
Syllabus
U.S. Supreme Court
SOUTHERN RAILWAY CO. v. UNITED STATES, 355 U.S. 370 (1958) 355 U.S. 370SOUTHERN RAILWAY CO. ET AL. v. UNITED
STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN
DISTRICT OF
VIRGINIA. No. 579.
Decided January 13, 1958.
154 F. Supp. 562, affirmed.
Henry L. Walker, Arthur J. Dixon, James A. Bistline and R. Granville Curry for appellants.
John W. Adams, Jr., Charles P. Reynolds, R. B. Claytor, Martin A. Meyer, Jr. and Walter C. Scott, Jr. for the Atlanta & St. Andrews Bay Railway Co. et al., and John S. Burchmore and Robert N. Burchmore for Cramet Inc., appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.
Opinions
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF
VIRGINIA. No. 579.
Decided January 13, 1958.
154 F. Supp. 562, affirmed. Henry L. Walker, Arthur J. Dixon, James A. Bistline and R. Granville Curry for appellants. John W. Adams, Jr., Charles P. Reynolds, R. B. Claytor, Martin A. Meyer, Jr. and Walter C. Scott, Jr. for the Atlanta & St. Andrews Bay Railway Co. et al., and John S. Burchmore and Robert N. Burchmore for Cramet Inc., appellees. PER CURIAM. The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed. Page 355 U.S. 370, 371
U.S. Supreme Court
SOUTHERN RAILWAY CO. v. UNITED STATES, 355 U.S. 370 (1958) 355 U.S. 370 SOUTHERN RAILWAY CO. ET AL. v. UNITED STATES ET AL.APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF
VIRGINIA. No. 579.
Decided January 13, 1958.
154 F. Supp. 562, affirmed. Henry L. Walker, Arthur J. Dixon, James A. Bistline and R. Granville Curry for appellants. John W. Adams, Jr., Charles P. Reynolds, R. B. Claytor, Martin A. Meyer, Jr. and Walter C. Scott, Jr. for the Atlanta & St. Andrews Bay Railway Co. et al., and John S. Burchmore and Robert N. Burchmore for Cramet Inc., appellees. PER CURIAM. The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed. Page 355 U.S. 370, 371
Search This Case
