ROSENGARD v. CITY OF BOSTON, 355 U.S. 272 (1957)
Decided:
December 16, 1957
Syllabus
U.S. Supreme Court
ROSENGARD v. CITY OF BOSTON, 355 U.S. 272 (1957) 355 U.S. 272ROSENGARD ET AL. v. CITY OF BOSTON ET
AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT OF MASSACHUSETTS.
No. 566.
Decided December 16, 1957.
Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Reported below: 336 Mass. 224, 143 N.E.2d 683.
Samuel P. Sears for appellants.
J. Edward Keefe, Jr. for appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Opinions
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT OF MASSACHUSETTS.
No. 566.
Decided December 16, 1957.
Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. Reported below: 336 Mass. 224, 143 N.E.2d 683. Samuel P. Sears for appellants. J. Edward Keefe, Jr. for appellees. PER CURIAM. The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. Page 355 U.S. 272, 273
U.S. Supreme Court
ROSENGARD v. CITY OF BOSTON, 355 U.S. 272 (1957) 355 U.S. 272 ROSENGARD ET AL. v. CITY OF BOSTON ET AL.APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT OF MASSACHUSETTS.
No. 566.
Decided December 16, 1957.
Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. Reported below: 336 Mass. 224, 143 N.E.2d 683. Samuel P. Sears for appellants. J. Edward Keefe, Jr. for appellees. PER CURIAM. The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. Page 355 U.S. 272, 273
Search This Case
