In a suit against a railroad in a state court under the Federal
Employers' Liability Act to recover damages for the wrongful death
of a conductor, a complaint alleging that he disappeared from a
moving train in very cold weather at a time when his duty required
his presence on the rear vestibule, that his absence was discovered
by other trainmen, that they negligently failed to make prompt
efforts to have him rescued, and that he died from the resulting
exposure,
held sufficient to support a judgment for
plaintiff if a jury should find under appropriate instructions that
the death resulted "in whole or in part" from failure of the
railroad's agents to do what "a reasonable and prudent man would
ordinarily have done under the circumstances." Pp.
333 U. S.
821-823.
31 Cal. 2d
117, 187 P.2d 729, reversed.
In a suit against a railroad under the Federal Employers'
Liability Act to recover damages for the alleged wrongful death of
an employee, a state court held that the allegations of the
complaint, even if true, were insufficient to support a judgment
for plaintiff, and entered judgment for defendant. The state
supreme court affirmed.
31 Cal. 2d
117, 187 P.2d 729.
Certiorari granted, judgment reversed,
and cause remanded, p.
333 U. S.
823.
PER CURIAM.
Petitioner, as administratrix, filed a complaint in a California
state court under the Federal Employers' Liability Act, 45 U.S.C.
§ 51, to recover damages for the alleged
Page 333 U. S. 822
wrongful death of one L. C. Bristow. The trial court held that
the allegations of the complaint, even if true, were totally
insufficient to support a judgment for plaintiff, and entered
judgment for the defendant. The State Supreme Court, two judges
dissenting, affirmed on the same ground. 187 P.2d 729.
*
The complaint's allegations and the inferences fairly drawn from
them in summary are as follows: November 24, 1942, the deceased was
a conductor on respondent's passenger train westbound from
Amarillo, Texas, to Belen, New Mexico. At about 5:30 a.m., while
the train was moving approximately opposite defendant's station at
Gallaher, New Mexico, decedent fell from the train's rear vestibule
where it was necessary for him to be in order properly to perform
the duty in which he was then engaged, "checking a certain train
order signal at said station" of Gallaher. Decedent's fall resulted
in injuries which made it impossible for him to secure help by his
own efforts. At the next station where the train stopped, St.
Vrain, respondent's employees "made note of the absence of
decedent," but passed by it and three other station stops, Melrose,
Taiban, and Fort Summer, without taking any steps of any kind to
ascertain the whereabouts of decedent or what had happened to him.
Finally, however at Yeso, New Mexico, the regular train conductor
directed respondent's employees there to wire other employees along
the route the train had traversed to ascertain decedent's
whereabouts. The Yeso employees "carelessly and negligently" failed
to transmit any message "for an unnecessarily long period of time,"
and
Page 333 U. S. 823
when the message was finally received by other of respondent's
employees at Clovis, New Mexico, they "carelessly and negligently
failed to institute and pursue a search within a reasonable period
of time." When search was ultimately made, decedent was found lying
alongside the track adjacent to the point where he had fallen while
performing his duties on the rear vestibule opposite the station at
Gallaher. Three days later, decedent died, due to exposure to the
very cold weather from the time he fell until he was finally
rescued.
It thus appears that we have a complaint which charges that a
conductor disappears from a moving train in bitter cold weather at
a time when his duty requires him to be on the rear vestibule, his
absence is discovered, and efforts of any kind to ascertain and
save him from his probable peril are not promptly made by other
train employees, the only persons likely to know of his
disappearance and the probable dangers incident to it. We are
unable to agree that, had petitioner been permitted to introduce
all evidence relevant under her allegations, the facts would have
revealed a situation as to which a jury, under appropriate
instructions, could not have found that decedent's exposure and
consequent death were due "in whole or in part" to failure of
respondent's agents to do what "a reasonable and prudent man would
ordinarily have done under the circumstances of the situation."
Tiller v. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co., 318 U. S.
54,
318 U. S. 67.
See also Jamison v. Encarnacion, 281 U.
S. 635,
281 U. S.
640-641;
Bailey v. Central Vermont R. Co.,
319 U. S. 350,
319 U. S. 353;
Blair v. Baltimore & O. R. Co., 323 U.
S. 600,
323 U. S. 604;
Lillie v. Thompson, 332 U. S. 459,
332 U. S.
461-462.
Certiorari is granted, the judgment is reversed, and the cause
is remanded to the State Supreme Court for proceedings not
inconsistent with this opinion.
Reversed.
* The sufficiency of the complaint to state a cause of action
was raised under California procedure by an objection of respondent
to hearing evidence. Such a procedure, the State Supreme Court
held, is in the nature of a general demurrer, under which
allegations of the complaint are deemed true.