BRIDGES v. WIXON, 323 U.S. 708 (1945)
Syllabus
U.S. Supreme Court
BRIDGES v. WIXON, 323 U.S. 708 (1945)323 U.S. 708
Harry BRIDGES, petitioner,
v.
I. F. WIXON, as District Director, Immigration and Naturalization
Service, etc.
No. 788.
Supreme Court of the United States
January 29, 1945
Messrs. Lee Pressman, Richard Gladstein, Henry Cohen, and Mrs. Carol King, for petitioner.
Solicitor General Fahy, Assistant Attorney General Tom C. Clark, and Messrs. Chester T. Lane, Robert S. Erdahl, and Leon Ulman, for respondent.
Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
Granted.
The motion of the Communist Political Association for leave to intervene is denied.
Mr. Justice JACKSON took no part in the consideration or
decision of these applications.
Opinions
v.
I. F. WIXON, as District Director, Immigration and Naturalization Service, etc.
No. 788.
Supreme Court of the United States January 29, 1945 Messrs. Lee Pressman, Richard Gladstein, Henry Cohen, and Mrs. Carol King, for petitioner. Solicitor General Fahy, Assistant Attorney General Tom C. Clark, and Messrs. Chester T. Lane, Robert S. Erdahl, and Leon Ulman, for respondent. Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Granted. The motion of the Communist Political Association for leave to intervene is denied. Mr. Justice JACKSON took no part in the consideration or decision of these applications.
U.S. Supreme Court
BRIDGES v. WIXON, 323 U.S. 708 (1945) 323 U.S. 708 Harry BRIDGES, petitioner,v.
I. F. WIXON, as District Director, Immigration and Naturalization Service, etc.
No. 788.
Supreme Court of the United States January 29, 1945 Messrs. Lee Pressman, Richard Gladstein, Henry Cohen, and Mrs. Carol King, for petitioner. Solicitor General Fahy, Assistant Attorney General Tom C. Clark, and Messrs. Chester T. Lane, Robert S. Erdahl, and Leon Ulman, for respondent. Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Granted. The motion of the Communist Political Association for leave to intervene is denied. Mr. Justice JACKSON took no part in the consideration or decision of these applications.
Search This Case
