1. The acquisition from the Creek Nation and the transfer to the
Seminole Nation, by the United States in 1882, of a 175,000 acre
tract
held unrelated to an alleged deficiency in a tract
previously transferred to the Seminoles pursuant to Article III of
the Treaty of March 21, 1866, since, at the time of the 1882
transfer, no suggestion of a deficiency in the treaty grant had
been advanced. P.
316 U. S.
315.
2. Under the Act of August 12, 1935, which, in the settlement of
claims against the United States by an Indian tribe, authorized
offsets of sums expended gratuitously by the United States for the
benefit of the tribe, the Court of Claims is required to find the
amount of the liability, if any, of the United States on the claim
of the tribe, and to designate and find the exact amount of the
gratuitous expenditures which may be utilized to extinguish, in
whole or in part, that liability. P.
316 U. S.
315.
94 Ct.Cls. 240 reversed.
Certiorari, 315 U.S. 791 to review a judgment dismissing the
petition of the Seminole Nation in a suit against the United States
under a special jurisdictional Act.
MR. JUSTICE MURPHY delivered the opinion of the Court.
The question presented for decision is whether the United States
remains under any obligation to the
Page 316 U. S. 311
Seminole Nation with respect to Article III of the Treaty of
March 21, 1866, 14 Stat. 755, 756, which provides in part:
". . . The United States having obtained by grant of the Creek
nation the westerly half of their lands, hereby grant to the
Seminole nation the portion thereof hereafter described, which
shall constitute the national domain of the Seminole Indians. Said
lands so granted by the United States to the Seminole nation are
bounded and described as follows, to-wit: beginning on the Canadian
river where the line dividing the Creek lands according to the
terms of their sale to the United States by their treaty of
February 6, 1866, following said line due north to where said line
crosses the north fork of the Canadian river; thence up said north
fork of the Canadian river a distance sufficient to make two
hundred thousand acres by running due south to the Canadian river;
thence down said Canadian river to the place of beginning. In
consideration of said cession of two hundred thousand acres of land
described above, the Seminole nation agrees to pay therefor the
price of fifty cents per acre, amounting to the sum of one hundred
thousand dollars. . . ."
Petitioner's claim is for just compensation for the alleged
taking by the United States of an asserted deficiency in the tract
granted by this Article.
Late in 1866, before the boundaries of the Seminole domain had
been located, the Seminoles moved to what was assumed to be their
treaty land. [
Footnote 1] The
first survey
Page 316 U. S. 312
of the line dividing the Creek and the Seminole territories,
made by one Rankin in 1868, under a contract with the
Superintendent of Indian Affairs, was not approved by the
Department of the Interior. In 1871, one Bardwell resurveyed the
dividing line and placed it seven miles west of the Rankin line.
Two months later, at the direction of the Government, one Robbins
ran the western boundary of the Seminole lands so as to include
200,000 acres from the Bardwell line. According to Robbins'
calculations, 200,000.03 acres were included between the Canadian
river on the south, the north fork of the Canadian river on the
north, the Bardwell line on the east, and the Robbins line on the
west. The Bardwell and Robbins surveys were both approved by the
Secretary of the Interior on February 5, 1872.
Meanwhile, pursuant to Article I of the Treaty of February 27,
1867, 15 Stat. 531, [
Footnote
2] the Pottawatomie tribe selected a tract bounded "by the West
line of the Seminole lands," and, on November 9, 1870, the
Secretary of the Interior approved that selection. In 1872, after
the location of the Robbins line, the Pottawatomies occupied the
territory immediately west of that line. Subsequently, the
Government allotted and patented the lands west of the Robbins line
to the Pottawatomies in severalty, or sold and
Page 316 U. S. 313
patented them to settlers and turned the purchase price into the
Treasury as public money. [
Footnote
3]
The Bardwell survey disclosed that a considerable area east of
the Seminole-Creek dividing line had been occupied by the
Seminoles, who had made substantial improvements on this land. In
order that the Seminoles might retain the lands which they had
improved, Congress authorized negotiations for the purchase of
these lands east of the Bardwell line. Act of March 3, 1873, 17
Stat. 626. An agreement was entered into on February 14, 1881, with
the Creek Nation whereby that Nation ceded land east of the
Bardwell line to the United States, the agreement providing that
the eastern boundary of the land ceded was to be drawn so that the
tract would aggregate 175,000 acres.
Creek Nation v. United
States, 93 Ct.Cls. 561, 566. The Creeks received $175,000 for
this tract. Act of August 5, 1882, 22 Stat. 257, 265. This land
became a part of the Seminole domain, and was disposed of either by
allotment to members of the tribe or by sale for the account of the
tribe.
The possibility of a deficiency in the original 200,000 acre
tract was first suspected in 1900. [
Footnote 4] By an amended
Page 316 U. S. 314
petition filed in the Court of Claims in 1937, [
Footnote 5] the Seminole Nation alleged that,
owing to an error in the location of the Robbins line, the
territory enclosed between the Robbins and Bardwell lines was
11,550.54 acres short of 200,000 acres, and that the United States
took from the Seminoles 11,550.54 acres west of the Robbins line
when the Government patented that land to individuals in 1892 and
subsequent years. Judgment was prayed against the United States for
value at the time of taking of the 11,550.54 acres, with interest
at the rate of five percent per annum. The Court of Claims made no
finding as to whether a shortage in fact existed in the tract
between the Bardwell and Robbins lines, but held that, in any
event, the Seminole Nation was more than compensated for the
alleged shortage by the Government's purchase for the Seminoles of
175,000 acres of land from the Creek Nation. The court also stated
that, even if petitioner were entitled to recover for any deficit
in the 200,000 acre tract, the Government would be entitled to
offset the value of the 175,000 acre tract as a gratuitous
expenditure under the Act of August 12, 1935, 49 Stat. 571, 596, a
value assumed to be far in excess of the value of whatever deficit
there may have been. We granted certiorari, 315 U.S. 791, because
of the close connection between this case and
Seminole Nation
v. United States, No. 348,
ante, p.
316 U. S. 286.
[
Footnote 6]
The judgment of the Court of Claims cannot be sustained on
either of the grounds advanced. The Government in this Court agrees
to this proposition, and
Page 316 U. S. 315
suggests that the cause be remanded to the Court of Claims.
I
Underlying the denial of recovery for any deficit in the 200,000
acre tract because petitioner was compensated therefor
"fifteen-fold" by the receipt of an additional 175,000 acres, is
the theory that the acquisition of land by the Seminoles under the
Treaty of 1866 and the acquisition of additional land to the east
by transfer from the Creeks in 1882 were but two parts of an
integral transaction, intended to give the Seminoles 200,000 acres
of land, and thus discharge the obligation of the Treaty of 1866.
However, the facts do not support that theory, for, in 1882, the
suggestion that a shortage existed in the supposed 200,000 acre
tract between the Bardwell and Robbins lines had not yet been
advanced. There was therefore no thought at the time the transfer
of the 175,000 acre tract was made that the Government thereby
fulfilled its treaty obligation by compensating the Seminoles for a
deficiency in the original tract.
II
The Act of August 12, 1935, 49 Stat. 571, 596, directs the Court
of Claims in suits by an Indian tribe or band
"to consider and to offset against any amount found due the said
tribe or band all sums expended gratuitously by the United States
for the benefit of the said tribe or band."
This language plainly requires the Court of Claims to find first
that money is due from the United States, to consider then whether
the United States has gratuitously spent sums for the benefit of
the tribe, and, if it finds such gratuitous expenditures, to offset
them against the amount found due.
In allowing the gratuity offset here, the Court of Claims fell
short of complying with the requirements of the offset
Page 316 U. S. 316
statute. There was no finding that the United States was under
any liability to the Seminole Nation; the Court stated only that
the value of the 175,000 acre tract was "far in excess of the value
of whatever deficit there may have been." The shortcomings of this
approach are evident. As we said in
Seminole Nation v. United
States, No. 348,
ante, p.
316 U. S. 286,
gratuity offsets resemble a fund in a bank, to be drawn on by the
Government as needed. If the Government owes nothing, it is
entitled to a dismissal on that ground, and should not be compelled
to use its gratuity offsets. If liability exists on the
Government's part, the exact amount of gratuitous expenditures
utilized to extinguish that liability, in whole or in part, should
be precisely found and designated. The Government should not be
held to satisfy its liability by the use of gratuity expenditures
in excess of the liability. Conversely, the Indian tribe is
entitled to have an exact determination of the amount owed it by
the United States in order that an amount of gratuity expenditures
equal to the liability may be exhausted, or that, if the available
offsets are insufficient, it receive a money judgment for the
difference. Otherwise, confusion and the possibility of a double
credit for a single offset arise, as this case and No. 348
abundantly demonstrate. In the latter case, a gratuity offset in
the amount of $165,847.17 on account of the purchase of the 175,000
acre tract from the Creeks was allowed, and here the assumed value
of that tract is the offset employed by the Court of Claims.
The judgment is reversed, and the cause remanded to the Court of
Claims with directions to consolidate it with No. 348; to determine
whether a shortage exists in the 200,000 acre tract; to determine
whether the Government is liable therefor, and the amount of such
liability, if a shortage exists; and to find and designate the
precise gratuitous expenditures used to offset the total
liability,
Page 316 U. S. 317
if any, arising from this claim and from Items Two and Five of
No. 348.
So ordered.
MR. JUSTICE REED took no part in the consideration or decision
of this case.
MR. JUSTICE JACKSON, dissents.
[
Footnote 1]
Although negotiations were in progress with the Creeks at time
the Seminole treaty was made, and a treaty was signed with them on
February 6, 1866, the Creek treaty was not concluded until June 14,
1866.
See 14 Stat. 785. The dividing line between the two
halves of the Creek country was not settled until the Bardwell
survey was approved in 1872.
[
Footnote 2]
By that Article, the United States agreed that a delegation from
the Pottawatomies should accompany a government commission to the
Indian country
". . . in order to select, if possible, a suitable location for
their people without interfering with the locations made for other
Indians, and if such location shall be found satisfactory to the
Pottawatomies, and approved by the Secretary of the Interior, such
tract of land, not exceeding thirty miles square, shall be set
apart as a reservation for the exclusive use and occupancy of that
tribe, and upon the survey of its lines and boundaries, and
ascertaining of its area, and payment to the United States for the
same, as hereinafter mentioned and set forth, the said tract shall
be patented to the Pottawatomie nation."
[
Footnote 3]
Provision was made for allotting the lands to the Pottawatomies
in severalty by Act of May 23, 1872, 17 Stat. 159, and Act of
February 8, 1887, 24 Stat. 388. By an agreement ratified by Act of
March 3, 1891, 26 Stat. 989, 1016-1017, the Pottawatomies ceded to
the Government the tract assigned to them. It was stipulated in the
agreement that all allotments in severalty, made or to be made,
should be completed and confirmed, and that other allotments in
severalty could be made until February 8, 1891. The ratifying act
provided that the remaining lands were to be opened to settlement
as public lands. 26 Stat. 1026.
[
Footnote 4]
Letter from the Commissioner of Indian Affairs to the Secretary
of the Interior, dated February 5, 1900.
Letter from the Acting Secretary of the Interior to the
Commission to the Five Civilized Tribes, dated October 16,
1900.
[
Footnote 5]
The original petition was filed in 1930. The amended petition
was filed after the amendment to the jurisdictional act. Act May
20, 1924, 43 Stat. 133, as amended by Act Aug. 16, 1937, 50 Stat.
650.
[
Footnote 6]
Petitioner has here limited its claim to 10,351.82 acres,
adopting the shortage given in the report, dated March 18, 1941, of
Arthur D. Kidder, District Cadastral Engineer of the General Land
Office, who surveyed the area after the original petition was
filed.