WAHLGREN v. BAUSCH & LOMB OPTICAL COMPANY, 292 U.S. 639 (1934)
Decided:
May 7, 1934
Syllabus
U.S. Supreme Court
WAHLGREN v. BAUSCH & LOMB OPTICAL COMPANY, 292 U.S. 639 (1934)292 U.S. 639
Roy M. WAHLGREN, petitioner,
v.
BAUSCH & LOMB OPTICAL COMPANY, et al.*
No. 942.
Supreme Court of the United States
May 7, 1934
Mr. Roy M. Wahlgren, pro se.
For opinion below, see 66 F.(2d) 660.
On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit. The motion for leave to proceed further herein in forma pauperis is denied, for the reason that the Court, upon examination of the papers herein submitted, finds no ground upon which a writ of certiorari should be granted. The petition for writ of certiorari is, therefore, also denied.
* Rehearing denied 292 U.S. 615, 54 S. Ct. 862, 78 L. Ed. --.[
Wahlgren v. Bausch & Lomb Optical Company 292 U.S. 639 (1934) ]
Opinions
v.
BAUSCH & LOMB OPTICAL COMPANY, et al.*
No. 942.
Supreme Court of the United States May 7, 1934 Mr. Roy M. Wahlgren, pro se. For opinion below, see 66 F.(2d) 660. On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit. The motion for leave to proceed further herein in forma pauperis is denied, for the reason that the Court, upon examination of the papers herein submitted, finds no ground upon which a writ of certiorari should be granted. The petition for writ of certiorari is, therefore, also denied. * Rehearing denied 292 U.S. 615, 54 S. Ct. 862, 78 L. Ed. --.[ Wahlgren v. Bausch & Lomb Optical Company 292 U.S. 639 (1934) ]
U.S. Supreme Court
WAHLGREN v. BAUSCH & LOMB OPTICAL COMPANY, 292 U.S. 639 (1934) 292 U.S. 639 Roy M. WAHLGREN, petitioner,v.
BAUSCH & LOMB OPTICAL COMPANY, et al.*
No. 942.
Supreme Court of the United States May 7, 1934 Mr. Roy M. Wahlgren, pro se. For opinion below, see 66 F.(2d) 660. On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit. The motion for leave to proceed further herein in forma pauperis is denied, for the reason that the Court, upon examination of the papers herein submitted, finds no ground upon which a writ of certiorari should be granted. The petition for writ of certiorari is, therefore, also denied. * Rehearing denied 292 U.S. 615, 54 S. Ct. 862, 78 L. Ed. --.[ Wahlgren v. Bausch & Lomb Optical Company 292 U.S. 639 (1934) ]
Search This Case
