1. In the Act of June 25, 1910, providing that
"whoever shall build a fire in or near any forest, timber, or
other inflammable material upon the public domain, or upon any
Indian reservation . . . shall, before leaving said fire, totally
extinguish the same, and whoever shall fail to do so shall"
be punished, etc., the words "upon the public domain" are to be
referred to the words immediately preceding,
viz.,
"forest, timber, or other inflammable material," so that the
statute applies where the fire is on private lands, but "near" to
inflammable grass on the public domain. P.
274 U. S.
266.
Page 274 U. S. 265
2. The Act, so construed, is constitutional, for Congress may
prohibit the doing of acts upon privately owned lands that imperil
the publicly owned forests. P.
274 U. S.
267.
3. The word "near" is not too indefinite. P.
274 U. S.
267.
Reversed.
Error to a judgment of the district court sustaining a demurrer
to an indictment.
Page 274 U. S. 266
MR. JUSTICE HOLMES delivered the opinion of the court.
Alford was indicted for building a fire near inflammable grass
and other inflammable material and timber situated upon the public
domain of the United States, and for not extinguishing the same
before leaving it, by reason of which the said grass and other
material was burned. The count was demurred to on the ground that
the statute concerned does not cover the building or leaving of
fires at any place except upon a forest reservation, and that, if
it attempts to cover fires elsewhere, it is unconstitutional and
void. The district court construed the statute in the same way, and
sustained the demurrer. A writ of error was taken by the United
States.
By the Act of June 25, 1910, c. 431, § 6, 36 Stat. 855,
857, amending § 53 of the Penal Code of March 4, 1909:
"Whoever shall build a fire in or near any forest, timber, or
other inflammable material upon the public domain, or upon any
Indian reservation, or lands belonging to or
Page 274 U. S. 267
occupied by any tribe of Indians under the authority of the
United States, or upon any Indian allotment while the title to the
same shall be held in trust by the government, or while the same
shall remain inalienable by the allottee without the consent of the
United States, shall, before leaving said fire, totally extinguish
the same, and whoever shall fail to do so shall be fined not more
than one thousand dollars or imprisoned not more than one year, or
both."
The court read the words "upon the public domain" as qualifying
the phrase "whoever shall build a fire." We are of opinion that
this was error, and that "upon the public domain" should be
referred to the words immediately preceding it: "forest, timber, or
other inflammable material." So interpreted, they make better
English and better sense. The purpose of the Act is to prevent
forest fires, which have been one of the great economic misfortunes
of the country. The danger depends upon the nearness of the fire,
not upon the ownership of the land where it is built. It is said
that the construction that we adopt has been followed by the
Department of Justice and by a number of cases in the district
courts ever since the passage of the original Act of February 24,
1897, c. 313, 29 Stat. 594. We regard the meaning as too plain to
be shaken by the suggestion that criminal statutes are to be
construed strictly. They also are to be construed with common
sense.
The statute is constitutional. Congress may prohibit the doing
of acts upon privately owned lands that imperil the publicly owned
forests.
Camfield v. United States, 167 U.
S. 518.
See McKelvey v. United States,
260 U. S. 353. The
word "near" is not too indefinite. Taken in connection with the
danger to be prevented, it lays down a plain enough rule of conduct
for anyone who seeks to obey the law.
Judgment reversed.