The provision in § 4 of the Act of January 28, 1915, c. 22,
38 Stat. 803, making judgments and decrees of the circuit courts of
appeals in bankruptcy proceedings final except on certiorari by
this Court, applies to all cases including those involving and
requiring interpretation of state statutes and application of the
federal Constitution.
Appeal from 221 F. 829 dismissed.
The facts, which involve the jurisdiction of this Court of
appeals in bankruptcy proceedings from the circuit court of appeals
under § 4 of the Act of January 28, 1915, are stated in the
opinion.
Page 239 U. S. 12
Memorandum opinion by MR. JUSTICE McREYNOLDS, by direction of
the court:
The I. Rheinstrom & Sons Company was adjudged a bankrupt in
April, 1912. Liens upon its property were claimed by appellees
under a Kentucky statute which appellants (general creditors)
maintained contravened the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution
of the United States. Overruling the referee, the district court
allowed the liens (207 F. 119), and this action was approved by the
circuit court of appeals, March 2, 1915, in an opinion which
expressly upheld the validity of the statute (221 F. 829).
Appellees have moved to dismiss the present appeal.
Section 4, Act of Congress, approved January 28, 1915 (38 Stat.
803, 804, c. 22), provides:
"That the judgments and decrees of the circuit courts of appeals
in all proceedings
Page 239 U. S. 13
and cases arising under the Bankruptcy Act and in all
controversies arising in such proceedings and cases shall be final,
save only that it shall be competent for the Supreme Court to
require by certiorari, upon the petition of any party thereto, that
the proceeding, case, or controversy be certified to it for review
and determination, with the same power and authority as if taken to
that court by appeal or writ of error; but certiorari shall not be
allowed in any such proceeding, case, or controversy unless the
petition therefor is presented to the Supreme Court within three
months from the date of such judgment or decree."
Manifestly, the words of the quoted section include the decree
below, and inhibit an appeal therefrom. It is argued, however, that
they should be so construed as to exclude causes requiring
interpretation of state statutes and application of the federal
Constitution, and thereby limited in effect to the supposed purpose
of Congress to relieve this Court only from the necessity of
reviewing bankruptcy cases which "involve complicated questions of
fact, rather than of law." We see no reason to doubt that the plain
language of the enactment aptly expresses the fixed legislative
intent. The appeal is accordingly dismissed for want of
jurisdiction.