BALTIMORE & O S W R. CO. v. U S, 216 U.S. 617 (1910)
Decided:
March 14, 1910
Syllabus
U.S. Supreme Court
BALTIMORE & O S W R. CO. v. U S, 216 U.S. 617 (1910)216 U.S. 617
BALTIMORE & OHIO SOUTHWESTERN
RAILROAD COMPANY, Plaintiff in Error,
v.
UNITED STATES.
Nos. 124, 125.
Supreme Court of the United States
March 14, 1910
Messrs. Edward Colston, Judson Harmon, A. W. Golsmith, and George Hoadly for plaintiff in error.
The Attorney General and the Solicitor General for defendant in error.
Judgments affirmed by a divided court and causes remanded to the District Court of the United States for the Southern district of Ohio.
Rehearing granted and cases restored to the docket for
reargument and assigned to be heard on the first Tuesday of the
next term (October 11) after the cases already assigned for that
day.
Opinions
v.
UNITED STATES. Nos. 124, 125. Supreme Court of the United States March 14, 1910 Messrs. Edward Colston, Judson Harmon, A. W. Golsmith, and George Hoadly for plaintiff in error. The Attorney General and the Solicitor General for defendant in error. Page 216 U.S. 617, 618 Judgments affirmed by a divided court and causes remanded to the District Court of the United States for the Southern district of Ohio. Rehearing granted and cases restored to the docket for reargument and assigned to be heard on the first Tuesday of the next term (October 11) after the cases already assigned for that day.
U.S. Supreme Court
BALTIMORE & O S W R. CO. v. U S, 216 U.S. 617 (1910) 216 U.S. 617 BALTIMORE & OHIO SOUTHWESTERN RAILROAD COMPANY, Plaintiff in Error,v.
UNITED STATES. Nos. 124, 125. Supreme Court of the United States March 14, 1910 Messrs. Edward Colston, Judson Harmon, A. W. Golsmith, and George Hoadly for plaintiff in error. The Attorney General and the Solicitor General for defendant in error. Page 216 U.S. 617, 618 Judgments affirmed by a divided court and causes remanded to the District Court of the United States for the Southern district of Ohio. Rehearing granted and cases restored to the docket for reargument and assigned to be heard on the first Tuesday of the next term (October 11) after the cases already assigned for that day.
Search This Case
