KANSAS CITY STAR CO. v. JULIAN, 215 U.S. 589 (1909)
U.S. Supreme Court
KANSAS CITY STAR CO. v. JULIAN, 215 U.S. 589 (1909)215 U.S. 589
KANSAS CITY STAR COMPANY, Plaintiff
in Error,
v.
HENRY S. JULIAN.
No. 85.
Supreme Court of the United States
December 6, 1909
Messrs. Isaac N. Watson, Hannis Taylor, Wash. Adams, and Frank Hagerman for plaintiff in error.
Messrs. John H. Atwood, O. H. Dean, and Ira Julian for defendant in error.
Per Curiam:
Writ of Error dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Sayward v. Denny, 158 U.S. 180, 39 L. Ed. 941, 15 Sup. Ct. Rep. 777; Mutual L. Ins. Co. v. McGrew, 188 U.S. 291, 307, 308 S., 47 L. Ed. 480, 484, 485, 63 L.R.A. 33, 23 Sup. Ct. Rep. 375; State ex rel. Horton v. Bland, 186
Mo. 701, 85 S.W. 561; F. G. Oxley Stave Co. v. Butler County, 166 U.S. 653, 41 L. Ed. 1151, 17 Sup. Ct. Rep. 709.
The attention of the state supreme court was not called to any Federal question until in the petition for rehearing, and that was too late. Loeber v. Schroeder, 149 U.S. 580, 585, 37 S. L. ed. 856, 859, 13 Sup. Ct. Rep. 934, and cases.
The judgment rested on non Federal grounds broad enough to
sustain it. Cincinnati Street R. Co. v. Snell, 193 U.S. 30, 48 L. Ed.
604, 24 Sup. Ct. Rep. 319; Hammond Packing Co. v. Arkansas,
212 U.S. 322, 53
L. Ed. 530, 29 Sup. Ct. Rep. 370.
U.S. Supreme Court
KANSAS CITY STAR CO. v. JULIAN, 215 U.S. 589 (1909) 215 U.S. 589 KANSAS CITY STAR COMPANY, Plaintiff in Error,v.
HENRY S. JULIAN.
No. 85.
Supreme Court of the United States December 6, 1909 Messrs. Isaac N. Watson, Hannis Taylor, Wash. Adams, and Frank Hagerman for plaintiff in error. Messrs. John H. Atwood, O. H. Dean, and Ira Julian for defendant in error. Per Curiam: Writ of Error dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Sayward v. Denny, 158 U.S. 180, 39 L. Ed. 941, 15 Sup. Ct. Rep. 777; Mutual L. Ins. Co. v. McGrew, 188 U.S. 291, 307, 308 S., 47 L. Ed. 480, 484, 485, 63 L.R.A. 33, 23 Sup. Ct. Rep. 375; State ex rel. Horton v. Bland, 186 Page 215 U.S. 589, 590 Mo. 701, 85 S.W. 561; F. G. Oxley Stave Co. v. Butler County, 166 U.S. 653, 41 L. Ed. 1151, 17 Sup. Ct. Rep. 709. The attention of the state supreme court was not called to any Federal question until in the petition for rehearing, and that was too late. Loeber v. Schroeder, 149 U.S. 580, 585, 37 S. L. ed. 856, 859, 13 Sup. Ct. Rep. 934, and cases. The judgment rested on non Federal grounds broad enough to sustain it. Cincinnati Street R. Co. v. Snell, 193 U.S. 30, 48 L. Ed. 604, 24 Sup. Ct. Rep. 319; Hammond Packing Co. v. Arkansas, 212 U.S. 322, 53 L. Ed. 530, 29 Sup. Ct. Rep. 370.
