ST. PAUL, M. & M.R. CO. v. MINNESOTA EX REL. CITY OF MINNEAPOLIS, 214 U.S. 497 (1909)
Syllabus
U.S. Supreme Court
ST. PAUL, M. & M.R. CO. v. MINNESOTA EX REL. CITY OF MINNEAPOLIS, 214 U.S. 497 (1909)214 U.S. 497
ST. PAUL, MINNEAPOLIS, & MANITOBA RAILWAY COMPANY and
Great Northern Railway Company, Plaintiffs in Error,
v.
STATE OF MINNESOTA EX REL. CITY OF MINNEAPOLIS.
No. 162.
April 26, 1909.
Messrs. Rome G. Brown, William R. Begg, and Charles S. Albert for plaintiffs in error.
Messrs. Frank Healy and Albert E. Clarke for defendant in error.
Per Curiam:
Judgment affirmed on authority of Northern P. R. Co. v.
Minnesota, 208 U.S.
583, 52 L. Ed. 630, 28 Sup. Ct. Rep. 341.
Opinions
v.
STATE OF MINNESOTA EX REL. CITY OF MINNEAPOLIS.
No. 162.
April 26, 1909. Page 214 U.S. 497, 498 Messrs. Rome G. Brown, William R. Begg, and Charles S. Albert for plaintiffs in error. Messrs. Frank Healy and Albert E. Clarke for defendant in error. Per Curiam: Judgment affirmed on authority of Northern P. R. Co. v. Minnesota, 208 U.S. 583, 52 L. Ed. 630, 28 Sup. Ct. Rep. 341.
U.S. Supreme Court
ST. PAUL, M. & M.R. CO. v. MINNESOTA EX REL. CITY OF MINNEAPOLIS, 214 U.S. 497 (1909) 214 U.S. 497 ST. PAUL, MINNEAPOLIS, & MANITOBA RAILWAY COMPANY and Great Northern Railway Company, Plaintiffs in Error,v.
STATE OF MINNESOTA EX REL. CITY OF MINNEAPOLIS.
No. 162.
April 26, 1909. Page 214 U.S. 497, 498 Messrs. Rome G. Brown, William R. Begg, and Charles S. Albert for plaintiffs in error. Messrs. Frank Healy and Albert E. Clarke for defendant in error. Per Curiam: Judgment affirmed on authority of Northern P. R. Co. v. Minnesota, 208 U.S. 583, 52 L. Ed. 630, 28 Sup. Ct. Rep. 341.
Search This Case
