GRUBB'S EX'RS v. GRUBB'S EX'RS, 2 U.S. 191 (1792)
Syllabus
U.S. Supreme Court
GRUBB'S EX'RS v. GRUBB'S EX'RS, 2 U.S. 191 (1792)2 U.S. 191 (Dall.)
Grubb's Executors
v.
Grubb's Executors
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
September Term, 1792
This cause being referred in the Common Pleas, the referrees made report into office; and afterwards the plaintiff removed the cause by certiorari into this Court.
But Ingersoll, on behalf of the defendant, now moved for a Procedendo; alledging that in a case of Pigot v. Young, it had been decided, that a cause could not be removed after the arbitrators, or referees, had entered on the business submitted, or referred, to them.
And the Court, accordingly, awarded a Procedendo.
Opinions
v.
Grubb's Executors Supreme Court of Pennsylvania September Term, 1792 This cause being referred in the Common Pleas, the referrees made report into office; and afterwards the plaintiff removed the cause by certiorari into this Court. Page 2 U.S. 191, 192 But Ingersoll, on behalf of the defendant, now moved for a Procedendo; alledging that in a case of Pigot v. Young, it had been decided, that a cause could not be removed after the arbitrators, or referees, had entered on the business submitted, or referred, to them. And the Court, accordingly, awarded a Procedendo.
U.S. Supreme Court
GRUBB'S EX'RS v. GRUBB'S EX'RS, 2 U.S. 191 (1792) 2 U.S. 191 (Dall.) Grubb's Executorsv.
Grubb's Executors Supreme Court of Pennsylvania September Term, 1792 This cause being referred in the Common Pleas, the referrees made report into office; and afterwards the plaintiff removed the cause by certiorari into this Court. Page 2 U.S. 191, 192 But Ingersoll, on behalf of the defendant, now moved for a Procedendo; alledging that in a case of Pigot v. Young, it had been decided, that a cause could not be removed after the arbitrators, or referees, had entered on the business submitted, or referred, to them. And the Court, accordingly, awarded a Procedendo.
Search This Case
