Section 716, Rev.Stat., does not empower this Court to review
the proceedings of military tribunals by certiorari.
The Act of April 12, 1900, c.191, having discontinued the
tribunal established under that act and created a successor
authorized to take possession of its records and to take
jurisdiction of all cases and proceedings pending therein, this
Court has no jurisdiction to review its proceedings.
Such tribunals are not courts with jurisdiction in law or equity
within the meaning of those terms as used in Article Three of the
Constitution.
MR. CHIEF JUSTICE FULLER delivered the opinion of the Court.
This was an application for leave to file a petition for
certiorari to review the proceedings of a tribunal established by a
General Order, numbered 88, of Brigadier-General Davis of the
United States Army, then commanding the Department of Porto Rico
and the supreme military authority in that island, in the nature of
a
quo warranto to oust Vidal and others from
Page 179 U. S. 127
the municipal offices of the Town of Guayama. The application
was submitted April 23, 1900, and, as usual, time was given for a
brief in opposition, which was presented April 30.
Section 716 of the Revised Statutes, brought forward from
section 14 of the Judiciary Act of 1789, provides:
"The Supreme Court and the circuit and district courts shall
have power to issue writs of
scire facias. They shall also
have power to issue all writs not specifically provided for by
statute, which may be necessary for the exercise of their
respective jurisdictions and agreeable to the usages and principles
of law."
This Court is not thereby empowered to review the proceedings of
military tribunals by certiorari. Nor are such tribunals courts
with jurisdiction in law or equity within the meaning of those
terms as used in the third Article of the Constitution, and the
question of the issue of the writ of certiorari in the exercise of
inherent general power cannot arise in respect of them.
By Act of Congress of April 12, 1900, 31 Stat. 77 c. 191, taking
effect, by its terms, on the first of May, the tribunal in question
was, as the act states, discontinued, and a United States district
court established as its successor, authorized to take possession
of its records and to take jurisdiction of all cases and
proceedings pending therein.
The result is, from either point of view, that this application
cannot be entertained.
Leave denied.