HENRIETTA MIN & MILL CO v. HILL, 173 U.S. 225 (1899)
Syllabus
U.S. Supreme Court
HENRIETTA MIN & MILL CO v. HILL, 173 U.S. 225 (1899)173 U.S. 225
HENRIETTA MIN. & MILL. CO.
v.
HILL.
No. 138.
February 27, 1899
W. H. Barnes and Frank Asbury Johnson, for appellant.
Mr. Justice BROWN.
The facts in this case, so far as they bear upon the question in
controversy, are precisely similar to the one just decided (Milling
Co. v. Johnson, 19 Sup. Ct. 402), and the judgment of the supreme
court of Arizona is therefore affirmed.
Opinions
v.
HILL.
No. 138.
February 27, 1899 W. H. Barnes and Frank Asbury Johnson, for appellant. Mr. Justice BROWN. The facts in this case, so far as they bear upon the question in controversy, are precisely similar to the one just decided (Milling Co. v. Johnson, 19 Sup. Ct. 402), and the judgment of the supreme court of Arizona is therefore affirmed.
U.S. Supreme Court
HENRIETTA MIN & MILL CO v. HILL, 173 U.S. 225 (1899) 173 U.S. 225 HENRIETTA MIN. & MILL. CO.v.
HILL.
No. 138.
February 27, 1899 W. H. Barnes and Frank Asbury Johnson, for appellant. Mr. Justice BROWN. The facts in this case, so far as they bear upon the question in controversy, are precisely similar to the one just decided (Milling Co. v. Johnson, 19 Sup. Ct. 402), and the judgment of the supreme court of Arizona is therefore affirmed.
Search This Case
