CHICAGO, B & Q R CO v. CITY OF CHICAGO, 166 U.S. 258 (1897)
Syllabus
U.S. Supreme Court
CHICAGO, B & Q R CO v. CITY OF CHICAGO, 166 U.S. 258 (1897)166 U.S. 258
CHICAGO. B. & Q. R. CO.
v.
CITY OF CHICAGO.
No. 130.
March 1, 1897
John J. Herrick, for plaintiff in error.
John S. Miller, for defendant in error.
Mr. Justice HARLAN delivered the opinion of the court.
This was a proceeding for condemnation under the constitution and laws of Illinois similar to the one just disposed of.
For the reasons stated in the above case (No. 129, 17 Sup. Ct. 581), the judgment of the supreme court of Illinois is affirmed.
Opinions
v.
CITY OF CHICAGO.
No. 130.
March 1, 1897 John J. Herrick, for plaintiff in error. John S. Miller, for defendant in error. Mr. Justice HARLAN delivered the opinion of the court. This was a proceeding for condemnation under the constitution and laws of Illinois similar to the one just disposed of. For the reasons stated in the above case (No. 129, 17 Sup. Ct. 581), the judgment of the supreme court of Illinois is affirmed.
U.S. Supreme Court
CHICAGO, B & Q R CO v. CITY OF CHICAGO, 166 U.S. 258 (1897) 166 U.S. 258 CHICAGO. B. & Q. R. CO.v.
CITY OF CHICAGO.
No. 130.
March 1, 1897 John J. Herrick, for plaintiff in error. John S. Miller, for defendant in error. Mr. Justice HARLAN delivered the opinion of the court. This was a proceeding for condemnation under the constitution and laws of Illinois similar to the one just disposed of. For the reasons stated in the above case (No. 129, 17 Sup. Ct. 581), the judgment of the supreme court of Illinois is affirmed.
Search This Case
