FERRY v. KING COUNTY, 141 U.S. 673 (1891)
Syllabus
U.S. Supreme Court
FERRY v. KING COUNTY, 141 U.S. 673 (1891)141 U.S. 673
FERRY et al.
v.
KING COUNTY et al.
December 7, 1891.
John Paul Jones and Reese H. Vorhees, for the motion.
J. C. Haines, opposed.
Mr. Chief Justice FULLER remarked that the same questions were presented in this case as in that just decided, (12 Sup. Ct. Rep. 128,) and it must take the same course.
Writ of error dismissed.
Opinions
v.
KING COUNTY et al. December 7, 1891. Page 141 U.S. 673, 674 John Paul Jones and Reese H. Vorhees, for the motion. J. C. Haines, opposed. Mr. Chief Justice FULLER remarked that the same questions were presented in this case as in that just decided, (12 Sup. Ct. Rep. 128,) and it must take the same course. Writ of error dismissed.
U.S. Supreme Court
FERRY v. KING COUNTY, 141 U.S. 673 (1891) 141 U.S. 673 FERRY et al.v.
KING COUNTY et al. December 7, 1891. Page 141 U.S. 673, 674 John Paul Jones and Reese H. Vorhees, for the motion. J. C. Haines, opposed. Mr. Chief Justice FULLER remarked that the same questions were presented in this case as in that just decided, (12 Sup. Ct. Rep. 128,) and it must take the same course. Writ of error dismissed.
Search This Case
