Reissued letters patent No. 10,137, granted June 13, 1882, to
the Commercial Manufacturing Company, Consolidated, for an
improvement in treating animal fats, the original patent, No.
146,012, having been granted December 30, 1873, to Hippolyte Mege,
as inventor, expired by the expiration in April, 1876, of a
Bavarian patent, and in May, 1876, of an Austrian patent, granted
to Mege for the same invention.
The question of the identity of the United States patent with
the Bavarian and the Austrian patents considered.
In equity. The case is stated in the opinion.
MR. JUSTICE BLATCHFORD delivered the opinion of the Court.
This is a suit in equity brought in the Circuit Court of the
United States for the Northern District of Illinois, on the 11th of
December, 1882, by the Commercial Manufacturing Company,
Consolidated, a New York corporation, and the National Dairy
Company, an Ohio corporation, against the Fairbank Canning Company,
an Illinois corporation, for the infringement of reissued letters
patent No. 10,137 granted June 13, 1882, on an application filed
May 20, 1882, to the Commercial Manufacturing Company,
Consolidated, for an improvement in treating animal fats. The
original patent, No. 146,012, was granted December 30, 1873, having
been applied for December 13 1873, to Hippolyte Mege, as
inventor.
Page 135 U. S. 177
it was assigned to the United States dairy company, and was
reissued to that company as No. 8,424, September 24, 1878. That
reissue was then assigned to one Remsen, who assigned it to the
Commercial Manufacturing Company, Consolidated, to which reissue
No. 10,137 was granted. The National Dairy Company was the
exclusive licensee for the State of Illinois, in which state the
infringement was alleged to have taken place.
The answer set up, among other defenses, that the United States
patent had expired before the last reissue thereof was granted, by
reason of the expiration of certain foreign patents granted to Mege
for the same invention; that the last reissue was invalid, and that
the defendant did not infringe.
So much of the specification of reissue No. 10,137 as is
important in the present case is as follows:
"Be it known that Hippolyte Mege, of Paris, France, now
deceased, chemist manufacturer, did invent an improved means for
transforming animal fat into butter, of which the following is a
specification:"
"This invention, which is the result of physiological
investigations, consists of artificially producing the natural work
which is performed by the cow when it reabsorbs its fat in order to
transform the same into butter. The improved means he employed for
this purpose are as follows:"
"I. Neutralization of the ferments. In order to prevent the
greasy substance which is settled in the tissue of the animals from
taking the disagreeable taste of the fat, it is necessary that the
ferments which produce this taste shall be completely neutralized.
For this effect, as soon as possible after the death of the animal,
he plunged the raw fats, called 'graisses en branches,' into water
containing fifteen percent of sea salt and one percent of sulphite
of soda. He began thus the transformation an hour at least, after
the immersion, and twelve hours at most, afterwards."
"II, Crushing. A complete crushing is necessary in order to
obtain rapid work without alteration. For this purpose, when the
substance is coarsely crushed, he let it fall from the cylinders
under millstones, which completely bruise all the cells. "
Page 135 U. S. 178
"III Concentrated Digestion. The crushed fat falls into a vessel
which is made a well tinned iron or enameled iron or baked day.
This vessel must be plunged in a water bath, of which the
temperature is raised at will. When the fat has descended in the
vessel, he melted it by means of an artificial digestion, so that
the heat does not exceed 103� Fahrenheit, and thus no taste
of fat is produced. For this purpose, he threw into the washtub
containing the artificial gastric juice about two liters per
hundred kilograms of greasy substance. This gastric juice is made
with the half of a stomach of a pig or sheep, well washed, and
three liters of water containing thirty grams of biphosphate of
lime. After a maceration during three hours, he passed the
substance through a fine sieve, and obtained the two liters which
are necessary for a hundred kilograms. He slowly raised the
temperature to about 103� Fahrenheit, so that the matter
shall completely separate. This greasy matter must not have any
taste of fat. It must, on the contrary, have the taste of molten
butter. When the liquid does not present any more lumps, he threw
into the said liquid one kilogram of sea salt (reduced to powder)
per hundred kilograms of greasy matter. He stirred during a quarter
of an hour, and let it set until obtaining perfect limpidness. This
method of extraction has a considerable advantage over that which
has been previously essayed. The separation is well made, and the
organized tissues which do deposit are not altered."
"IV. Crystallization in a mass. In order to separate the
oleomargarine from the stearine, separated crystallizers or
crystallizations at unequal temperatures have been already
employed. He contrived for this purpose the following method, which
produces a very perfect separation, and is as follows:"
"He rendered the molten fat in a vessel which must be sufficient
for containing it. This vessel is placed in a washtub of strong
wood, which serves as a water bath. In this washtub he put water at
the fixed temperature of 86� Fahrenheit for the soft fats
proceeding from the slaughterhouse, and 98� for the harder
fats, such as mutton fat. Afterwards the washtubs are covered, and
after a certain time, more or less long according
Page 135 U. S. 179
to the fats, the stearine is deposited in the form of teats in
the middle of the oleomargaric liquid."
"V. Separation by centrifugal force. In order to avoid the
numerous inconveniences of the employment of the presses which have
been hitherto used, he caused the mixture of stearine and
oleomargarine to flow into a centrifugal machine, called
'hydro-extractor.' The greasy liquid passes through the cloth, and
the stearine is collected. When all the liquid is passed, he put
the machine in motion, and the crystals of stearine are entirely
exhausted without the auxiliary of the presses. However, during
certain seasons there are animals which produce crystals of
stearine soft enough for rendering necessary the stroke of a press
as a last operation; but in this case, this operation has little
importance, because it is applied only to a fraction of the
product. In all cases, the oleomargarine is separated from the
stearine when it is cold, and passed to the cylinder, constituting,
especially if its yellow color has been raised, a greasy matter of
very good taste, and which may replace the butter in the kitchen,
where it is employed under the name of 'margarine,' but if it is
desired to transform it into more perfect butter, he employed the
following means."
The claims in that reissue are as follows:
"1. The improved material herein described, produced by treating
animal fats so as to remove the tissues and other portions named,
with or without the addition of substances to change the flavor,
consistency, or color, as set forth."
"2. The process herein described of treating animal fats in the
production of oleomargarine."
The claims of reissue No. 5,868 were six in number, and those of
reissue No. 8,424 were nine in number, while the claims of the
original patent and of reissue No. 10,137 were identical in number
and language.
After a replication to the answer, proofs were taken, and the
case was heard before Judges Gresham and Blodgett. The opinion of
the court, delivered by the latter, is found in 27 F. 78, and, in
accordance with its conclusions, a decree was entered, on the 22d
of March, 1886, dismissing the bill. From that decree the
plaintiffs have appealed.
Page 135 U. S. 180
The ground for the dismissal was that the Bavarian patent, which
was granted April 8, 1873, expired April 8, 1876; that the Austrian
patent, which was granted October 31, 1869, expired May 26, 1876,
and that therefore reissue No. 10,137 was invalid because the
application on which it was granted was not made until May 20,
1882. Mege also took out a patent in France for his invention, July
15, 1869, for fifteen years. The defendant contends that the
Bavarian and the Austrian patents were granted for the same
invention as reissue No. 10,137, while the plaintiffs allege the
contrary.
The text of the specification of the Bavarian patent is as
follows:
"The crude fats and the crude tallow have, until the present
time, been used in a very imperfect manner for the preparation of
edible fat or soaps, or the fabrication of melted tallow for the
preparation of fatty acids, by means of chemical modes of
saponification or other purposes."
"The new modes of procedure described herein consist both of
chemical and physiological processes. They are not intended to
improve the former methods of fabrication, but, on the contrary, on
account of their nature and better properties, furnish neutral and
new products. They are especially intended to benefit the navy and
the less wealthy classes by furnishing excellent edible and
preservable fats at a price considerably lower than that of present
similar products; for instance, butter and the finer grades of
fats."
"The reduction in the price of butter will, in a large measure,
contribute to the general wealth, for stock-raisers, instead of
making butter, will feed their milk to calves, and thereby get more
stock, thus furnishing more cattle for slaughtering purposes and at
a lower price. The new procedure is also of considerable
importance, from a hygienic point of view, in doing away with the
emanation of bad odors inevitable with the former chemical methods,
and due to the excessive high temperature to which fats had been
exposed. The new procedure depends upon the following conclusions
of modern science: 1. that the malodorous, colored, acid, and
rancid ingredients are not originally contained in the crude
Page 135 U. S. 181
fats as they occur in nature; 2, that these harmful substances
are developed by the activity of the organized tissues under the
influence of fermentation, heat, and chemical agents; 3, that the
fats of milk, termed 'butter,' consist only of the immediate fat,
which is altered first by a cellular tissue, and then by the
organized tissue of the udder. By utilizing these principles in
industrial pursuits or in domestic economy, there is obtained from
the crude fats and the tallow:"
"A. A pure fat, without the customary fatty smell and taste,
which does not stick to the palate and which resembles the fatty
bodies most desired for eating purposes."
"B. Stearine for candles."
"C. As a residue, common tallow."
"D. This fat, really identical with the fat of butter, taken
from its source before it has been changed in the milk gland, can
be made into different kinds of butter, which, although prepared by
an artificial process, is really butter, and differs only from the
ordinary butter by keeping fresh for a much longer length of
time."
"The means employed in the new preparation of these partly new,
partly known, products constitute, in their details and in their
entirety, the invention which we claim as our property. They are as
follows:"
"1. Washing and crushing. The crude fat is exposed to a jet of
cold water between the conical cogs on two iron cylinders. It is
finely subdivided by the current of water and the pressure, and
falls thence into a tank, where a current of cold water completes
the washing."
"2. Artificial digestion. This fat, now freed from all soluble
animal substances, is mixed with artificial gastric juice (stomach
of the pig or sheep in acidulated water) to the extent of immersing
it completely, or, to 1,000 kilo of fat, 300 kilo. of water, 1
kilo. bicarbonate of sodium, and two stomachs (pig or sheep) are
added. This mixture is then kept at the temperature of the animal
body (by means of steam pipes or otherwise) until all the molten
fat has been dissolved by the pepsin of the stomachs, and appears
in a clear layer on the surface. It is allowed to settle, or it is
decanted, and the
Page 135 U. S. 182
process repeated in order to extract all the fatty constituents,
which now have lost the odor of animal fat, but have obtained a
particular taste. The residue is tallow."
"3. Cooling. The fluid fat is poured into vessels which have an
opening at the bottom, and contain a layer of tepid water. They are
covered, and when crystallization has occurred in consequence of
cooling, the water is drawn off through the opening, the vessel is
inverted, and the coke is allowed to fall on a table."
"4. Pressure. This operation is intended to separate the hard
constituent, which makes the fact granular, congeal rapidly, and
stick to the palate. The cooled fat is cut into slices about one
inch thick, and put into a cloth between hot plates of a press. The
portion which runs off is a mixture of margarine and oleine,
resembling lard in composition, and of about the taste of fresh
butter. It melts in the mouth like butter, and does not stick to
the palate like beef fat. The solid residue taken out of the cloth
is good stearine, fit for making candles immediately."
"5. Uniformity and ductility. In order to remove the granular
appearance of the margarine produced by congelation and to give it
the solid and uniform appearance usually possessed by fats, and in
order also to remove any air which may have entered and might
interfere with its preservation, without admitting air again, a
vessel is filled with the fat, completely closed, and a churning or
stirring apparatus in its interior is set into motion. The
margarine is thus kept in motion, and is then withdrawn from the
vessel before cooling. It is now hard, or even brittle, according
to the temperature. It is rendered soft and ductile by rolling it
between wooden cylinders. It is put into the form of plates, or
filled in tubs, to be put in the market."
"6. Decolorization. The first fat is ordinarily of a light
yellow color. If it is desired to remove this color without
attacking the fat, the property which the fat possesses of
remaining fluid for some time before cooling can be utilized. In
this state, an acid -- for instance, muriatic acid -- is added in
sufficient quantity to remove the color, and it is then
Page 135 U. S. 183
washed with tepid water until the last trace of acid has
disappeared."
"This entire procedure, with or without pressure, can be applied
to all crude fats."
"The white or faintly yellowish fat obtained by means of the
described procedure is remarkably pure, and has a taste of almonds,
hitherto not known of any animal fat. It is especially available
for --"
"A. Food, as a substitute for animal fats and lard."
"B. For the fabrication of fine toilet soaps."
"C. The manufacture of ordinary soaps to replace the olive
oil."
"D. The lubrication of machinery, which is never attacked if the
one hundredth part of calcined magnesia be added to the fat."
"E. The artificial production of butter."
"7. Transformation into butter. The pure fat, which has
undergone no change by heat or chemical agents, is the same
substance which the cow consumes in its organism in order to have
it pass through the udder in the form of milk, fat, or butter. The
fat is therefore but butter in its original form. This observation,
and the observation that the milk gland of a cow contains a kind of
pepsin possessing the property of making a milky emulsion of fat
and water, are the basis of the industrial procedure of changing
fat into butter, a physiological operation, to be carried out as
follows:"
"At the temperature of the animal body, one part of fat is mixed
with the same quantity of water, to which 1/50 part (two percent
milk cheese, or milk without water, or cream in water) has been
added, and with 1/100 part of bicarbonate of sodium and 1/50 part
of the tissue of the mammary gland. The mixture is kept at the
temperature of the body and allowed to work. When the fat becomes
milky, it appears at first like a thick milky cream. Later on it
changes into butter, which is allowed to cool with the precautions
explained in articles 3 and 5. The gland tissue of the mixture can
also be replaced by artificial products, but with a less
satisfactory result. Butter thus prepared keeps longer than milk
butter, and does not, like the latter, acquire the pungent odor
[due]
Page 135 U. S. 184
to butyric acid, or it contains less caseine, insoluble in
ether, and may contain less water or buttermilk, as may be desired,
than butter obtained in the usual manner. Since the above-described
modes of procedure, dependant on known and on unknown methods, are
new in their industrial entirety and furnish new products, we claim
them as our exclusive property for the entire term of the
patents."
The text of the specification of the Austrian patent is as
follows:
"My invention consists in the production of neutral fatty bodies
of hitherto unknown natural appearance and excellent properties. By
means of special treatment of the crude tallow, I obtain a pure
fat, devoid of smell and taste, which does not become rancid and
which keeps for a long time. This substance I obtain through
procedures partly known, partly new, the entirety of which
constitutes the following methods:"
"1. Perfect washing. This is done by crushing the fresh fat just
taken from the animal between rollers under a spray of fresh water.
The fat, subdivided finely by the action of the water and the
pressure, falls into a tub, where the washing is completed by a
current of water."
"2. Artificial digestion. This fat, from which all soluble
animal substances have been removed, is mixed with artificial
gastric juice (Maceration of a pig's stomach in acidulated water)
in sufficient quantity to immerse it, and the mixture is kept at
the temperature of the animal body until the fat appears as a clear
layer on the surface. The mixture is allowed to settle, and the
sediment is subjected to another operation in order to extract all
fatty matter, which in this case has no longer the odor of animal
fat, but the taste of finest fats."
"3. Pressure. This operation separates the hard constituent,
which makes the fat granular, and causes it to congeal rapidly.
This work, hitherto very difficult, is carried out on a commercial
scale, in the following manner: the fluid clear fat is poured into
vessels with an opening at the bottom, and containing a layer of
tepid water. They are covered, and when the cooling and the
crystallization have taken place, the
Page 135 U. S. 185
water is drawn off through the opening, the vessel is inverted,
and the mass allowed to fall upon a table. It is cut into cakes one
to two centimeters thick. These are put into canvas, and pressed
between two warm plates. By this method there is obtained about
sixty percent of a fatty body resembling butter, and identical in
composition with lard, but free from odor, and of a perfectly pure
taste. The solid portion remains in the canvas."
"4. Uniform solidity is given to this fatty body in the
following manner: in order to make it hard, and not granular,
without admitting air, it is poured into a tinned-iron vessel
filled thus completely. This well closed vessel contains a stirring
apparatus, kept in motion from the outside. The vessel is, besides,
kept surrounded by cold water, so that the fat which is being
stirred, while cooling without the admission of air, becomes thick
and uniform. It is then put into another vessel, where it becomes
completely solid and hard. This hard fat is finally cut or sliced
into thin slices by some cutting machine similar to the mechanical
arrangement used for cutting fine soaps, the blades being set to
furnish thin slices. This work, giving the fat the proper
ductility, can also be done by hand."
"5. Decolorization can be employed or omitted as desired. This
fat is usually of a yellow tinge. This color can be removed easily
and without damage by utilizing the property of the fat of
remaining fluid for some time in cooling. In this state, it is
mixed with enough fine acid -- for instance, muriatic acid -- to
remove the color. It is then repeatedly washed with warm water
until the last trace of the acid has been removed. This entire
procedure, with or without pressure, can be employed in the case of
any fresh fat just taken from the animal. By means of the same, I
obtain partly solid, partly soft, white, or faintly yellowish,
perfectly pure fatty bodies, which have a faint flavor of almonds.
These new fatty bodies are applicable to various industrial
purposes, according to their degree of consistency, especially to
--"
"1. The fabrication of toilet soap, particularly fine, and
beneficial to the skin. "
Page 135 U. S. 186
"2. The fabrication of ordinary soaps, to replace the olive oil,
and give a large yield."
"3. The lubrication of machinery, which is never attacked by
this excellent lubricating materials, especially when 1/1000 part
of calcined magnesia has been added."
"I claim therefore as my invention, the above-described mode of
preparation of a wholly new fatty body. The peculiar points of
importance of my procedure consist in washing, digesting, pressing,
solidifying, and decolorizing."
It is contended by the plaintiffs that they have shown, by the
testimony of experts, that reissue No. 10,137 differs from the
foreign patents in these particulars: (1) the neutralization of the
ferments is entirely lacking in each foreign patent; (2) complete
crushing is provided for in the United States patent, so as to
bruise all the fat cells, while the foreign patents do not provide
for such complete crushing, but do provide for coarse crushing and
washing, both of which actions render difficult, if not impossible,
the production of the article which is the result of the United
States patent, and involve a different process; (3) each of the
foreign patents makes vital the use of an artificial digestion,
produced by a large proportion of gastric juice, while the United
States patent practically dispenses with this gastric juice as an
operative element in the process and product, and relies upon the
slow increase of temperature to produce complete separation; (4)
each foreign patent directs the cooling of the product of
solidification, so as to be sliced into pieces to be pressed, while
the United States patent directs a crystallization at a uniform
temperature, about 86�, leaving the oil fluid, and (5) each
foreign patent provides for the separation of oil from the stearine
by pressing the cold-sliced or solidified cakes between hot or warm
plates, while the United States patent separates the oil from the
stearine with the product at the temperature of uniform
crystalization, namely, 86�. The contention is that no step
of the foreign patents is found in the United States patent, nor
any equivalent therefor, and that the artificial digestion, the
cooling to solidification, and the pressing between hot plates,
found in each of the foreign patents, is an absolute bar to the
Page 135 U. S. 187
production of the article which is the result of the United
States patent.
Professor Henry Morton, an expert witness for the plaintiffs,
says:
"There is, of course, a difference in the improved product
described and claimed in the Mege patent, according as it is made
with or without the addition of materials affecting its color,
consistency, and flavor. I will therefore refer to each of these
conditions separately. When the improved product of Mege, without
these additions referred to, is compared with ordinary dairy
butter, we find it to be substantially identical therewith, as
regards its main constituents and its general consistency and
character. Both products then consist substantially of mixtures in
nearly the same proportions, in either case, of stearine,
margarine, and oleine, and both are unctuous solids, varying in
consistency, being quite solid near the melting point of ice, quite
fluid at a temperature of about 90�, and more or less soft
and plastic at intermediate temperatures. The Mege product,
however, differs from dairy butter, in the first place, as to its
composition, by reason of the presence in the dairy butter of
several substances not found in the Mege product. Thus, the dairy
butter contains about five percent to six percent of the peculiar
fat known as 'butyrine;' it also contains a smaller amount of
casein, some trace of albumen; also extremely minute quantities of
caprilin, caproilin, and caprylin. None of these substances would
be present in the Mege product, as above referred to, which would
therefore lack the peculiar flavor due to the presence of these
products. The amount of water and of salt would also, as a rule, be
greater in dairy butter than in the Mege product. There would also
be a difference in consistency, inasmuch as the dairy butter would
not constitute a homogeneous mass of fatty substance, but would be
a solid emulsion of such fatty substance, in which the same existed
as minute spheroids or particles of the said fatty substance,
separated from each other by an aqueous fluid consisting of water,
holding in solution salt and traces of albumen and casein. When the
Mege product has been converted into a more perfect butter, as he
calls it, by
Page 135 U. S. 188
the addition of certain substances, as indicated by him, it will
then contain all or nearly all the materials found in dairy butter,
though not in exactly the same proportions, all these distinctive
matters being, as a rule, present in smaller proportions in the
Mege product than in the dairy butter. As regards the water and
salt, the relative proportions may vary either way in different
samples, depending upon the amount of salt added and the amount of
working to which the butter of the Mege product has been subjected.
As regards consistency of the more perfect butter of the Mege
patent and ordinary dairy butter, there will be a substantial
identity, both being solid emulsions of fatty matter with an
aqueous fluid. . . . As articles of food, the Mege product and
ordinary dairy butter are only distinguishable by characteristics
which are variations of degree. Thus the Mege product, in its
simplest form, would have less flavor and a less agreeable
consistency than good dairy butter, while, on the other hand, its
freedom from disagreeable flavor would render it superior to a low
or poor grade of dairy butter. When the flavoring materials were
added, the Mege product would then be extremely difficult to
distinguish from the best dairy butter, but, as compared with a
very fine and highly flavored dairy butter, would be lacking in
flavor. As regards wholesomeness, I do not think there would be any
difference between the Mege product, in either of its conditions,
and ordinary good dairy butter, though the Mege product would be
better in this respect than a strong or rancid quality of dairy
butter. The same remark applies to the nutritiousness of the
materials compared, while as regards palatableness, the Mege
product would, I think, hold an intermediate place between the
highest and the lower grades of dairy butter, being better than the
low grades and not quite equal to the highest in this respect."
On the question of the identity of the Bavarian patent with
reissue No. 10,137, the opinion of the circuit court, after quoting
the text of the specification of the Bavarian patent, says:
"Here we have the directions of the Bavarian patent for
producing the Mege product, consisting, 'first, of crushing
Page 135 U. S. 189
between cogged cylinders and washing, by which it is finely
subdivided.' The American patent says: 'A complete crushing is
necessary under millstones.' So that it would seem there is only a
difference in degree in the Bavarian and American processes as to
the crushing. The American process says the fat must be completely
crushed, so as to bruise all the cells; the Bavarian patent says it
is to be finely subdivided by the current of water, and by crushing
between the conical cogs of iron cylinders. In both patents, Mege
uses the word 'crushing' as a title or heading for his directions.
The directions for the artificial digestion are the same for the
two patents, except that in the Bavarian he does not instruct
specifically how to make the artificial gastric juice. He simply
says it is 'the stomach of a pig or sheep in acidulate water,' but
the proof in this case shows that the mode of making artificial
gastric juice was well known in the arts between the date of Mege's
invention, and he undoubtedly assumed that the person who would
attempted to use the process covered by his patent would have
sufficient physiological and chemical knowledge and skill to make
artificial gastric juice. The American patent also states that the
fat, while in the process of digestion, is to be kept at a
temperature of 103� Fahrenheit, while the Bavarian patent
says it is to be the temperature of the animal body; but the proof
in this case shows that 103� Fahrenheit is the temperature
of the animal body, so it would seem there is no substantial
difference between the processes of digestion described in the two
patents. The third step in the Bavarian patent is entitled
'Cooling,' the process of which is pouring the clear liquid fat
into vessels which have an opening at the bottom, and containing a
layer of tepid water, where they are covered, and remain until
crystallization has occurred in consequence of the cooling. He does
not give specific directions as to the temperature at which the fat
is to be kept during the crystallizing process, but evidently
leaves that to the skill of the operator, assuming that he will
sufficiently understand by the use of the word 'crystallization'
what the process must be. The next step after crystallization is
the separation of the oleo and margarine from the crystallized
stearine, and this in the Bavarian
Page 135 U. S. 190
patent is accomplished by pressure between the hot plates of a
press. Inasmuch as the centrifugal machine, or the hydro-extractor,
and the press are equivalent devices for accomplishing the same
results -- that is, of expelling the liquid or fluid contents from
the mass -- there is no essential difference between the Bavarian
and American patents in this step of the process. The Bavarian
patent is also silent as to the neutralization of the ferments or
germs of decay, but it can hardly be possible that any person would
enter upon the manipulation of animal fat without sufficient common
knowledge and skill to know, without instruction by the specific
terms of the patent, that in order to produce sweet and pure oil or
fat, the process of fermentation and decay must be prevented. So
that, taking the Bavarian patent as a whole, there would seem to be
such an identity in the processes described as to make them
essentially the same. Probably because Mege assumed that whoever
would attempt the transformation of crude fats under his process in
Bavaria would possess more knowledge or experience in regard to the
handling of fats than he assumed would be known in this country as
a matter of general knowledge, he deemed it necessary in his
American patent to give more minute and specific directions in
regard to some of the steps of the process than he did in his
foreign patents. Yet we think there can be no doubt that he has
substantially described the same process in both patents."
In regard to the Austrian patent, the opinion of the circuit
court says:
"In the Austrian patent issued to Mege, October 31, 1869, he
describes the first process under the title of 'Perfect washing,'
which he says is done 'by crushing the fresh fat just taken from
the animal between rollers under a spray of fresh water.' The
second step, 'Artificial digestion,' consists in mixing the crushed
fat with artificial gastric juice (maceration of a pig's stomach in
acidulated water) in sufficient quantity to immerse it, and the
mixture is kept at the temperature of the animal body until the fat
appears in a clear layer on the surface. Here we have the same
process as in the American patent, except that the directions for
crushing do not include grinding or crushing under millstones,
Page 135 U. S. 191
and he gives no recipe for making artificial gastric juice
except that of the maceration of a pig's stomach in acidulated
water, which we must infer he assumed was a sufficient direction to
enable an ordinarily intelligent person, skilled in the art of
manipulating or handling fats, to make the gastric juice. The
directions for crystallization require the clear fluid fat to be
poured into a vessel with an opening at the bottom, and containing
a layer of tepid water. The vessel is then covered, and when the
cooling and crystallization have taken place the cooled mass is
turned out, cut in slices, and placed in canvas bags, and pressed
between warm plates; by which method, he says, there is obtained
about sixty percent of a fatty body resembling butter, and
identical in composition with lard, but free from odor, and of a
perfectly pure taste."
The opinion then proceeds:
"The French and the English patents give substantially the same
description for the process as is contained in the Austrian and
Bavarian patents. All the steps of the American patent, with the
exception of the neutralization of the ferments, are specifically
called for and described, although, perhaps, not with all the
minute directions which are found in the American patent. All the
proofs agree that Mege was a man of inventive genius and high
scientific acquirements, and it can hardly be possible that if,
between the time he took out the French, English, and Austrian
patents, in 1869 and the Bavarian patents, in April, 1873, and the
time when he applied for his American patent, in December, 1873, he
had discovered any substantially new and material addition to the
process covered by those foreign patents, he would not have
specifically named and stated wherein the American differed from
the foreign patents. As already said, it seems clear from Mege's
own statements and those of his solicitors that the purpose was to
cover by the American patent what had been covered by his French
patent of 1869, and we cannot believe that if anything in addition
to this foreign patent had been intended to be introduced into the
American patent, it would not have been stated in some explicit
terms, and there can be no doubt that the French, Austrian, and
Bavarian patents are substantially identical. "
Page 135 U. S. 192
In regard to the foreign patents, the opinion of the circuit
court says:
"The scientific experts called by the complainant, Professors
Morton, Chandler, and Wheeler, have testified that they do not
think the invention described in the American patent is found in
either of the foreign patents. Their reasons for such conclusion,
briefly summarized, are (1) that the crushing spoken of in the
foreign patents is not so complete and thorough as that called for
by the American patent, where the fat is to fall from cylinders
under millstones, which shall completely bruise all the cells; (2)
that in the American patent, the digestion is to be accomplished
with a less quantity of gastric juice than is called for by the
foreign patents, as the foreign patents say the crushed fat is to
be immersed in the artificial gastric juice; (3) that by the
American patent, the temperature may be raised above 103�
Fahrenheit, 'so that the matter shall completely separate,' while
the foreign patents limit the degree of heat to the temperature of
the animal body; (4) that in the foreign patents the process of
cooling is allowed to proceed to such a point that the mass can be
cut in pieces or slices, while in the American patent the product
is not allowed to cool so as to become rigid, but is retained at a
temperature of about 86�."
"With all due respect to the opinions of these eminent chemists,
we must say that the points of difference suggested by their
testimony are purely and wholly differences in degree. The
necessity of crushing is stated in all the patents, both American
and foreign. The degree of crushing would obviously affect the
quantity of oil extracted from the fat by the process of digestion,
as the only object of crushing is to release the fat from the
tissues in which it is held in its natural condition. The necessity
for thorough and minute comminution is one that would suggest
itself from any operative's common knowledge. Any man who had
intelligence enough to know the use of his own teeth would know the
necessity of the complete comminution of any article to be
subjected to the process of digestion or the action of the gastric
juice. It would hardly require a scientist to instruct an operative
that the more finely a substance is comminuted,
Page 135 U. S. 193
the more direct and prompt would be the action of the gastric
juice and the process of digestion."
"As to the differences in the process of digestion between the
American and foreign patents, it would seem to be true that the
measured quantity of gastric juice directed to be used in the
American patent is less than that called for in the foreign
patents, because he gives specific directions as to the number of
liters of gastric juice for 100 kilograms of fat in the American
patent, while in the foreign patent he says the fat must be
immersed in the gastric juice; but the proof shows that the formula
for the gastric juice in the American patent gives a more potent
and effective product, and we presume Mege may, by his experience
and practice under his patents, have ascertained at the time he
took the American patent that the process of digestion could be
accomplished with a less quantity of gastric juice than was
described in his first patents. But this is only a difference in
degree, and with a larger quantity of gastric juice, and not so
complete comminution, about the same result would probably be
obtained as with complete and thorough crushing of all the fat
cells and a smaller quantity of gastric juice, especially if made
stronger or more potent. So that the difference in the American and
foreign patents in that regard seems to us wholly immaterial and
unsubstantial."
"As to the claim that these witnesses find in the American
patent permission to raise the temperature above 103�
Fahrenheit, we do not think it is well founded when the whole of
Mege's specifications in his American patent are considered. Under
the third head, 'Concentrated digestion,' Mege says: 'When the fat
has descended in the vessel, he melted it by means of artificial
digestion, so that the heat does not exceed 103�
Fahrenheit.' Further on in the same paragraph, he says: 'He slowly
raised the temperature to about 103� Fahrenheit, so that the
matter shall completely separate.' Taking these two expressions
together, it seems to us the first limits the second, and that the
directions of the patent are specific not to raise the temperature
above 103� Fahrenheit. Certainly the language, 'I slowly
raise the temperature to about 103�' does not authorize
raising
Page 135 U. S. 194
the temperature above that point. When the distinction
immediately before us is that it must not exceed 103�
Fahrenheit, and when we consider this language of the
specifications in the light of the testimony in the case, which
shows that gastric juice is destroyed whenever its temperature is
raised much above 103� Fahrenheit, we think there can be no
doubt that the eminent scientist who devised this process intended
to keep within the limits in which his gastric juice would be
operative for the purposes of digestion."
"The last and final distinction, that the foreign patents
contemplated a cooling of the mass below 86�, or until it
had become stiff, so that it could be handled and cut, before the
pressure was applied for the purpose of separating the
oleomargarine from the stearine, is a distinction, as it seems to
us, without a difference. If the stearine had become crystallized
in the mass, although it might at one time have been cooled below
86�, when it was sliced, and placed between the warm plates
in the press, the oleomargarine would again become liquid, and flow
out under the action of the warm plates and the press, so as to
secure the separation, and that such was the result is sufficiently
established by the statements in the foreign patents, notably the
Austrian and English, that about sixty percent of a mixture of the
margarine and olein, of a composition identical with lard, but of
superior flavor, was obtained by the pressure, would seem to show,
in the light of the proof in this case, that he obtained as large a
product as is obtained by the process of the American patent."
"A fair test of the question as to whether the American patent
is anticipated by the foreign patents, or is included in them, we
think would be: were a person in this country, after the issue of
the present American patent, to commence the manufacture of
oleomargarine by the precise process described in the Bavarian or
Austrian patents, supposing that process had not been patented
abroad, would the courts refuse an injunction to restrain the use
of the process on the ground that it infringed that covered by the
American patent? We can hardly deem it possible that any
intelligent court would deny an injunction if applied for under
such circumstances,
Page 135 U. S. 195
and we think this fairly illustrates the relation of the foreign
to the American patent."
The conclusion of the circuit court was that the plaintiff's
patent expired by the expiration of the Bavarian and Austrian
patents.
We have carefully considered the arguments urged in the briefs
of the counsel for the plaintiffs, in connection with the testimony
of their experts, and are of opinion that the views of the circuit
court, above quoted, are correct. Its decree is
Affirmed.